On 26 Dec, 17:38, "Andrew Heenan" wrote:
Readers here may be less informed, but most are not stupid; my suggestion of
2045 - especially couched in the terms I used, make it so obviously 'not a
fact' that your resonse is more than sad, it's pathetic.

I don't have a problem with IMHO, and use it where there might be doubt or
confusion; to use it in those circumstances would have been pedantic,
childish and patronising - Your area, not mine, IMNSHO.

"pathetic"....."childish"......

And then you go and change my email address in your snipping....

" "Chris" wrote ..."

It appears the cap fits your head, mate! You're so obviously wearing
it, you're showing it off big time......