View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old January 5th 09, 10:00 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.local.london
thedarkman thedarkman is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 9
Default are train fares necessary?

On 5 Jan, 11:52, "Recliner" wrote:
"thedarkman" wrote in message



So go on, please give us a quick summary of what money is saved. *Yes,
you won't need the Oyster card system, barriers and ticket machines, but
are you suggesting they cost more than the fares raised?

And would you give free travel to all the tourists and other foreign
visitors to the UK?



Have you read my letter and the associated mathematics? No ticket
staff, no revenue protection and therefore no prosecutions for
fraudulent travel, which costs millions in court time and stuff. If
all the money comes from one source - Central Government - you cut
out the costs associated with the other two. All of them.

Free travel will lead to greater use of public transport, less petrol
imported, less expense, less air pollution. As for the bloke who said
if you use it, you pay for it, he misses the point that the taxpayer
is already subsidising travel, ie the privately owne train companies.
Wouldn't you rather see the public subsidised directly?