On Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:12:20 -0000, Roland Perry
wrote:

In message e.net, at
14:53:31 on Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Mark Goodge
remarked:
Given that this whole debate is with the benefit of hindsight,
shouldn't
that also apply to the injury?

It does. The injury was limb-threatening. And that's considered a high
priority call.

That's fair enough, but far from the "any call is an emergency
life-threatening call" that has been much peddled.


As a member of the public it seems to be the sensible assumption though.