On 18 May, 19:19, 1506 wrote:
On May 12, 3:13*pm, "Peter Masson" wrote:

"Paul Scott" wrote

So exactly what is the extra work DfT are paying for at Camden - as Peter
suggested NR and TfL are happy with the descope, does that mean 'happy for
the time being' or 'four tracking completely abandoned for ever'?

AIUI the only feature that's been lost in the descope which might be of
benefit for the planned train service is the turnback platform at Camden
Road. Instead, trains from Stratford which terminate there will have to go
on to the Primrose Hill line to reverse, where they would block freight..
However, at one time TfL were at least toying with he idea of eventually
extending someELLXtrains down the DC line, at least as far asQueensPark
(perhaps in conjunction with extending the Bakerloo to Watford Junction and
withdrawing the Euston - Watford Junction DC service). This would presumably
need 4-tracking through Camden Road, and a different track layout between HI
and Camden Road.

Peter

IMHO extending the East London Line to Queens Park makes sense. *And,
moreover extending them on to Watford makes better sense. *It would be
easier then extending the Bakerloo to Watford. *The route could be
third rail throughout, except for the short joint Bakerloo stretch.

Watford to west Croydon by way of Whitechapel trains could open up a
world of travel and interchange possibilities.

Hmm, like Watford to Croydon journeys which you could already do on
the existing Southern Service via Kensington Olympia. The existing
plans for the extension from Dalston Junction to Highbury and
Islington quite sufficient - the number of people travelling via
Dalston between Watford and Croydon will not be very high.