View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old May 30th 09, 10:54 PM posted to uk.transport.london
[email protected] rosenstiel@cix.compulink.co.uk is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Default Oyster revenue allocation question

In article ,
(Richardr) wrote:

"D DB 90001" wrote

The easiest way to solve the problem would be to adopt a LOROL
style
approach to ALL suburban services in London, whereby the service
frequency and operations are determined by TfL and operated under
contract by the respective TOCs.



But wouldn't that effectively mean that almost the entire rail
network in the south-east would be decided by TfL - a body
controlled by the mayor of just part of that network?

Most south-east services are to, from, through London.


That is already a concern for us in Cambridge. In Ken's day he was trying
to impose additional stops on WAGN/FCC trains to suit his electorate but
not ours.

--
Colin Rosenstiel