View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old June 17th 09, 01:56 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default Southern ITSO PAYG

On 17 June, 12:57, Mizter T wrote:
On Jun 17, 12:08*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:





In a GoVia press release on the new SN franchise there is a small section
(that I've edited) about ticketing:


http://www.govia.info/press/goviaSCpn.doc


"Fares and ticketing
*Introduction of an ITSO-certified Smartcard ticketing system across the
network by January 2012
Introduction of Oyster Pay As You Go
Multi-modal Pay As You Go ITSO Smartcard for Crawley/Gatwick and Brighton,
working in partnership with Metrobus and Brighton and Hove Buses
respectively"


It is the last bit that is significant. *We have previously discussed how
PAYG might operate in an ITSO scheme, and a number of posts have proposed
that a national PAYG scheme like Oyster is impossible due to the high
maximum fares that would need to be covered by the preloaded amount, which I
agree with.


SN seem therefore to be suggesting localised areas for Crawley/Gatwick and
Brighton. I expect there will be criticism from pax who'll think they'll
need more than one smartcard, but in principle, could the same physical card
contain for example Brighton area ITSO PAYG, a Brighton to London ITSO
Season, and Oyster PAYG? *Might there be a common cash balance, or two
separate ones?


I can foresee multiple issues with it all being held on the same
physical card - e.g. if that card held a Brighton to London (ITSO)
season and also Oyster PAYG, what happens if a passenger alights at
Clapham Jn then switches to the London Overground (LO) WLL service to
reach Kensington Olympia, with the intention of paying for the LO WLL
journey with Oyster PAYG - when the punter 'touched-out' at KO would
the Oyster validator there be expected to work out how they'd got
there, and be able to read the ITSO season ticket and fathom out that
it was valid as far as Clapham Junction so the fare that needed to be
deducted was just from CJ to KO? (Also bear in mind that at present
the Oyster validator equipment isn't compatibe with ITSO either.)

OK, I suppose one could solve that by insisting that some intermediate
validation takes place, in the above case at Clapham Jn when changing
trains (i.e. touch on an 'interchange' validator within the confines
of CJ station). But what if the passenger changes trains at East
Croydon onto the Southern WLL service - would they then have to do an
intermediate validation at East Croydon? If so, would "the system"
then work out that the journey from East Croydon to CJ was covered by
the season ticket, then the CJ to KO journey would be covered by
Oyster PAYG?

And what if a passenger got on a (FCC) Thameslink train from Brighton
to St Pancras, i.e. through the central London 'core'? The season
ticket would only be valid as far as City Thameslink - for when coming
from the south that is the limit of "London Terminals" ticket validity
- but the train nonetheless *continues northbound to St Pancras and
beyond. In this scenario there's no opportunity for a passenger to do
any intermediate validation because they remain on the same train (I'm
excluding any jumping off and back on heroics!) - so would the system
then be able to fathom out how far the season ticket was valid for and
then deduct the appropriate Oyster PAYG fare?

If it was, then that would mean the Oyster system - which has been
designed with local/regional London journeys as its basis - being
fundamentally re-engineered so as to cope with interfacing with new
ITSO based railway ticketing as well.

So in essence I think it's unlikely.


But it's only a more general case of the problem which already exists
when extending an LU journey beyond the zones of a paper travelcard,
and which TfL has refused to address. People are currently expected
to get out and wait for a later train, in order to get the wonderful
benefits of Oyster (ie avoid the enormous fare hikes for cash fares)
when extending a zone on LU.

Why shouldn't they still be expected to get out and wait for a later
train? I think it's appalling that people should ever have to do
that, but it wouldn't be a change resulting from implementation on
National Rail, just a wider range of situations where it might occur.