View Single Post
  #36   Report Post  
Old July 17th 09, 04:04 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Andy Andy is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 498
Default Tube to Battersea

On 17 July, 00:35, John B wrote:
On Jul 16, 10:40*pm, Theo Markettos theom

wrote:
That would be served by making them set-down/pick-up only, though, and not
advertise them as calling at CJ? *At CJ with trains to Waterloo from many
platforms, there's not much to be gained by standing on the fast Woking
lines platform on the chance of picking up a train to Waterloo, when there
are the slow lines plus the Windsor lines too with advertised trains. *Is it
really worth the commuter picking a packed 444 over a packed 455? *Does the
455's extra stops at Vauxhall (and maybe Queenstown Road) make such a
difference?


A 444 at Woking will be less packed than a 455 at Clapham, IMX. And
given the regularity of many Southern Region commuters' commutes, I
don't think advertised vs unadvertised makes much difference.

I've seen an article in the SWT magazine that described why they don't stop
in the up direction... IIRC a call takes about 1.5 mins which eats a path.
To switch to the slow lines to call eats even more paths.


Surely if the train behind is also stopping at CJ, then the net eating-
of-paths is 0?


No, because you can get less trains through the station per hour. If
trains take 3 mins (20 trains per hour) to pass though a piece of line
without stopping and you add 1 1/2 mins to that (4 1/2 mins total),
you will get less trains per hour though that section (13 1/3 trains
per hour). Signalling alterations will change the calculations, but if
the line is signalled for non-stop services then stopping will always
mean less paths available.