View Single Post
  #179   Report Post  
Old July 19th 09, 09:57 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit
Charles Ellson Charles Ellson is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 724
Default HS1 Domestic trains are a bit busy

On Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:32:10 -0700 (PDT), John B
wrote:

On Jul 19, 10:55*am, Mizter T wrote:
Lots of places have signs but no distinct government. I think I've seen
"England" on signs, and even "London" is rather complex concept to pin
down as a specific "thing".


England exists, legally, though - e.g. the Department of [English]
Health.


Rubbish - see Charles Ellson's answer. The Department of Health has a
whole number of UK-wide responsibilities as well as its (primary)
responsibility for healthcare in England and Wales.


ITYM 'in England', not 'in England and Wales'.

England does of course exist legally - though there are a number of
areas where a reference to England is actually an abbreviated
reference to England *and* Wales (e.g. reference to contracts being
enforced according to "English law" in "English courts"). In the past
one could have said that constitutionally Wales was basically part of
England, but with devolution this description would be less apt.


That's why I used the DoH as an example, as Englandandwales is a
single entity for most legal and non-devolved governmental purposes.

Not since 1978 through the successive effects of the Welsh Language
Act 1967, the Local Government Act 1972 and the Interpretation Act
1978; the latter Act has references to "England and Wales" but defines
them separately as "England" and "Wales".

London is easy: the Corporation's area is the City of London, the GLA
area is Greater London, and there isn't anything else.


Yes there is. There's the London postal district - and there's a whole
number of places within Greater London that are outwith the London
postal district (e.g. in the south east fringes there's lots of places
with "Bromley" as the post town and hence BRx postcodes


Is there a London postal district? AIUI, there are various postcodes
that fall within Greater London, including E ones, BR ones, and so on.
Some of these sorting offices also cover areas outside London.

A "London Postal District" was a sub-division (defined by points of
the compass, i.e. N, W, E, NW, SE, SW, EC, WC) of the "London Postal
Area". Modern Royal Mail arrangements do not conform to the associated
boundaries although they still define postcode areas. The London
Postal Area was larger than the County of London but smaller than the
present Greater London.

Similarly, I'm sure there are pizza establishments in outer London
that deliver to Hertfordshire, Essex, Surrey and Kent, and pizza
establishments in Herts, Essex, Surrey and Kent that deliver to
London.

They'll probably deliver to Dublin if you pay enough.

- back when
the postal county was properly included as part of the address, these
places would have had Kent in their address too, and many people still
continue to include it).


And back when they were in Kent, they were in Kent. This isn't
relevant now.

So somebody gives you an address in Hayes sans postcode or locality...

Sewardstone, near Epping Forest, meanwhile is outside Greater London
but has a London postcode - E4.


It has a postcode that's primarily used within Greater London, yes.
I'm surprised by that actually - how did the PO's E district get so
far out...?

It covered large parts of Essex until 1965.

The London telephone dialling code 020 covers a larger area than the
London postal district, including many places outside of Greater
London. Meanwhile other places on the edges of Greater London have
dialling codes other than 020 London.


My father lives in India and has a +44 20 phone number. My office is
in Islington and has an +1 646 phone number. Are BT phone numbers even
still /supposed/ to be geographical?

There are various practical reasons for doing so.

The Met Police District used to cover an area larger than Greater
London, but this was rationalised when the GLA was created and these
areas were transferred to the appropriate home counties police force.


ie this isn't relevant now.

It would be if older legislation was deleted rather than amended by
later legislation, but that is not how things work in the UK.

The London fares (aka Travelcard) zones of course cover an area larger
than Greater London - and that's the case even if we're only talking
about the 'proper' zones 1-6.


'The TfL zonal area'. Yes, OK, I'll give you that one, ish.

I think there's a number of other examples where an official or quasi-
official body of one sort or another defines London in different ways.


Examples (from the present day)?