View Single Post
  #222   Report Post  
Old July 20th 09, 02:47 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit
Martin Edwards Martin Edwards is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2005
Posts: 104
Default HS1 Domestic trains are a bit busy

Mizter T wrote:
On Jul 19, 1:49 am, John B wrote:

On Jul 18, 7:57 pm, Arthur Figgis wrote:

Lots of places have signs but no distinct government. I think I've seen
"England" on signs, and even "London" is rather complex concept to pin
down as a specific "thing".

England exists, legally, though - e.g. the Department of [English]
Health.


Rubbish - see Charles Ellson's answer. The Department of Health has a
whole number of UK-wide responsibilities as well as its (primary)
responsibility for healthcare in England and Wales.

England does of course exist legally - though there are a number of
areas where a reference to England is actually an abbreviated
reference to England *and* Wales (e.g. reference to contracts being
enforced according to "English law" in "English courts"). In the past
one could have said that constitutionally Wales was basically part of
England, but with devolution this description would be less apt.

London is easy: the Corporation's area is the City of London, the GLA
area is Greater London, and there isn't anything else.


Yes there is. There's the London postal district - and there's a whole
number of places within Greater London that are outwith the London
postal district (e.g. in the south east fringes there's lots of places
with "Bromley" as the post town and hence BRx postcodes - back when
the postal county was properly included as part of the address, these
places would have had Kent in their address too, and many people still
continue to include it).

It was never properly included. Postcodes were trialled in Watford and
we were told from the outset not to put the county name.