View Single Post
  #51   Report Post  
Old July 25th 09, 01:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
Tom Anderson Tom Anderson is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,188
Default First passenger service journey for LUL 09 stock

On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Basil Jet wrote:

Andy wrote:

Just to be clear, I wasn't arguing for air conditioning to be fitted,
but I still think you are mis-estimating the effect of regeneration on
the total energy consumption and heating for the new trains. The whole
point of regeneration is to reuse the energy which used to be 'wasted'
in resistor banks on the trains (with the original rheostatic train
brakes). My understanding is that little of the recovered energy goes
back to the lineside equipment, if the current rails are not receptive,
then the spare energy goes to resistors, like in older stock. The extra
big lineside equipment is purely because more current is needed in the
first place.


What happened to the test of trackside rotating cylinders designed to
store the energy from regenerative braking?


That was just spin.

tom

--
Miscellaneous Terrorists: Ducks | Bird Flu | Avian flu | Jimbo Wales |
Backstreet Boys | The Al Queda Network | Tesco -- Uncyclopedia