On Sun, 28 Dec 2003 13:03:48 +0000 (UTC), "Cast_Iron"
wrote:


How sad that you cannot separate the use of a common phrase to describe
an
attitude

Falsely ascribing views and running away when challenged could be
described
as an attitude. Given you had no evidence to support this supposition, it
clearly was a term of emotive abuse, never mind a clear logical fallacy in
the form of an appeal to consequences.


to hurling personal abuse. So what were you saying about limited
intellect?


That would be the lying goit who posted

"Wasn't me that introduced cars, was it you?"


How sad that you haven't yet learnt about discussion and debate to explore
options and possibilities.

Something I suggest a lying troll who selectively misquotes, rewrites
others posts and then swears blind that 'it wasnt me guv' when caught,
should attempt to adhere to rather than projecting your lameness upon
others.


Perhaps when you get to be a big boy you'll be
able to play with the grown ups.


Most amusing coming from the Natural inheritor of Duhg Bollens mantle.



greg





--
Once you try my burger baby,you'll grow a new thyroid gland.
I said just eat my burger, baby,make you smart as Charlie Chan.
You say the hot sauce can't be beat. Sit back and open wide.