Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many of these sets are now in use? I commute each day Seven
Sisters/Tottenham Hale to Central London and still haven't seen one running... -- Phil Richards, London, UK 3,600+ railway photos since 1980 at: http://europeanrail.fotopic.net http://britishrail.fotopic.net |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 04 May 2010 20:08:41 +0100
Phil Richards wrote: How many of these sets are now in use? I commute each day Seven Sisters/Tottenham Hale to Central London and still haven't seen one running... I went past the depot by train on a sunday a few weeks ago and only saw 1 set sitting there though of course any others could have been in service. B2003 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I travelled on one today, and was not impressed.
The good points - bright lighting, smoother ride, more standing space But the downside of the last point is less seating space. The seating follows the current fashion of being all sideways, which personally I detest. Crabs evolved to travel sideways, humans go forwards. Another drawback is that is much harder to see out of the window. Now I know that isn't an issue on the Victoria Line, which is all underground, but on other lines which do have surface sections it adds to the frustrations of travel. The seats themselves seem to have been designed for midgets, with inadequate depth for an average sized adult male and very thin upholstery. Some tube journeys can be quite long - I have a regular trip between Totteridge and Whetstone and South Wimbledon which takes one hour ten minutes, and I wish transport chiefs would pay a little more attention to the comfort of such passengers rather than basing the designs on the needs of short distance commuters only. Peter |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"peter" wrote in message
I travelled on one today, and was not impressed. The good points - bright lighting, smoother ride, more standing space But the downside of the last point is less seating space. The seating follows the current fashion of being all sideways, which personally I detest. Crabs evolved to travel sideways, humans go forwards. Another drawback is that is much harder to see out of the window. Now I know that isn't an issue on the Victoria Line, which is all underground, but on other lines which do have surface sections it adds to the frustrations of travel. The seats themselves seem to have been designed for midgets, with inadequate depth for an average sized adult male and very thin upholstery. Some tube journeys can be quite long - I have a regular trip between Totteridge and Whetstone and South Wimbledon which takes one hour ten minutes, and I wish transport chiefs would pay a little more attention to the comfort of such passengers rather than basing the designs on the needs of short distance commuters only. Of course, most Victoria Line journeys are short, and all are entirely underground. The 2009 stock can't operate on any other Tube line, and nor will it be the basis for the replacement Piccadilly Line stock (which is likely to be based on the current Northern Line stock). I think the limited, harder, mainly/entirely longitudinal seating will be more of a problem with the new S stock, which will often be used for much longer journeys on the District and Met lines. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 May 2010 09:47:16 +0100
"Recliner" wrote: underground. The 2009 stock can't operate on any other Tube line, and I wonder if thats really true. The victoria line runs through some old piccadilly line tunnels at finsbury park and the 2009 stock I rode on managed it without clipping the tunnel walls. nor will it be the basis for the replacement Piccadilly Line stock (which is likely to be based on the current Northern Line stock). I Lets hope they put the hamsters on some doses of steroids before they supply the trains. The acceleration of the northern line trains is utterly woeful. B2003 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 May, 10:19, wrote:
On Fri, 14 May 2010 09:47:16 +0100 "Recliner" wrote: underground. The 2009 stock can't operate on any other Tube line, and I wonder if thats really true. The victoria line runs through some old piccadilly line tunnels at finsbury park and the 2009 stock I rode on managed it without clipping the tunnel walls. Different signalling systems and method of safe operation. There's more to it than train/tunnel size. PhilD -- |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 14 May 2010 03:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
PhilD wrote: Different signalling systems and method of safe operation. There's more to it than train/tunnel size. But the onboard signalling system could be changed. You can't do much about the size of the train through. B2003 |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/05/2010 09:47, Recliner wrote:
wrote in message I travelled on one today, and was not impressed. The good points - bright lighting, smoother ride, more standing space But the downside of the last point is less seating space. The seating follows the current fashion of being all sideways, which personally I detest. Crabs evolved to travel sideways, humans go forwards. Another drawback is that is much harder to see out of the window. Now I know that isn't an issue on the Victoria Line, which is all underground, but on other lines which do have surface sections it adds to the frustrations of travel. The seats themselves seem to have been designed for midgets, with inadequate depth for an average sized adult male and very thin upholstery. Some tube journeys can be quite long - I have a regular trip between Totteridge and Whetstone and South Wimbledon which takes one hour ten minutes, and I wish transport chiefs would pay a little more attention to the comfort of such passengers rather than basing the designs on the needs of short distance commuters only. Of course, most Victoria Line journeys are short, and all are entirely underground. The 2009 stock can't operate on any other Tube line, and nor will it be the basis for the replacement Piccadilly Line stock (which is likely to be based on the current Northern Line stock). I think the limited, harder, mainly/entirely longitudinal seating will be more of a problem with the new S stock, which will often be used for much longer journeys on the District and Met lines. Any idea when and where we might catch sight of/see the S stock? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 May, 23:16, "
wrote: On 14/05/2010 09:47, Recliner wrote: *wrote in message I travelled on one today, and was not impressed. The good points - bright lighting, smoother ride, more standing space But the downside of the last point is less seating space. *The seating follows the current fashion of being all sideways, which personally I detest. *Crabs evolved to travel sideways, humans go forwards. Another drawback is that is much harder to see out of the window. Now I know that isn't an issue on the Victoria Line, which is all underground, but on other lines which do have surface sections it adds to the frustrations of travel. *The seats themselves seem to have been designed for midgets, with inadequate depth for an average sized adult male and very thin upholstery. Some tube journeys can be quite long - I have a regular trip between Totteridge and Whetstone and South Wimbledon which takes one hour ten minutes, and I wish transport chiefs would pay a little more attention to the comfort of such passengers rather than basing the designs on the needs of short distance commuters only. Of course, most Victoria Line journeys are short, and all are entirely underground. The 2009 stock can't operate on any other Tube line, and nor will it be the basis for the replacement Piccadilly Line stock (which is likely to be based on the current Northern Line stock). I think the limited, harder, mainly/entirely longitudinal seating will be more of a problem with the new S stock, which will often be used for much longer journeys on the District and Met lines. Any idea when and where we might catch sight of/see the S stock? They've been running for a while now. A couple of times I've got a platform to see one departing. Not managed to travel on one yet. Last I heard, there were 5 sets running (out of how many I don't know). Don't know if they run specific diagrams either. If so, you might catch one southbound from Oxford Circus at about 8am. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Stu" wrote in message
On 14 May, 23:16, " wrote: On 14/05/2010 09:47, Recliner wrote: Of course, most Victoria Line journeys are short, and all are entirely underground. The 2009 stock can't operate on any other Tube line, and nor will it be the basis for the replacement Piccadilly Line stock (which is likely to be based on the current Northern Line stock). I think the limited, harder, mainly/entirely longitudinal seating will be more of a problem with the new S stock, which will often be used for much longer journeys on the District and Met lines. Any idea when and where we might catch sight of/see the S stock? They've been running for a while now. A couple of times I've got a platform to see one departing. Not managed to travel on one yet. Last I heard, there were 5 sets running (out of how many I don't know). Don't know if they run specific diagrams either. If so, you might catch one southbound from Oxford Circus at about 8am. No, no S stock trains are in service yet, and they'd need to go on a starvation diet to squeeze their way down to Oxford Street. I believe that there is one S stock test train in London, but don't know if it even has seats fitted. I think they begin to enter service on the District Line next year. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
2009 stock | London Transport | |||
2009 Stock loading gauge | London Transport | |||
Victoria line 2009 stock customer feedback | London Transport | |||
2009 stock | London Transport |