Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
umpston wrote:
On 17 May, 16:04, "Recliner" wrote: "umpston" wrote in message (LUL engineering trains also usually have a battery or diesel loco at both ends - this also means the train can easily be reversed from locations where a crossover is not available.) Is it also the rule that both cabs must be manned? Whenever I've seen an engineering train pass, both cabs of the battery locos seem to be manned. I don't know. What would be the point of such a rule? The non-driving cabs might just be occupied by engineering staff needing a lift to the work site. There are many practical advantages to manning both cabs - especially when you think how difficult it might be to get from one end of the train to the other when underground away from stations, for instance in reversing sidings. With normal trains the driver can walk through all the cars... Paul S |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 May, 22:26, "Paul Scott" wrote:
umpston wrote: On 17 May, 16:04, "Recliner" wrote: "umpston" wrote in message (LUL engineering trains also usually have a battery or diesel loco at both ends - this also means the train can easily be reversed from locations where a crossover is not available.) Is it also the rule that both cabs must be manned? Whenever I've seen an engineering train pass, both cabs of the battery locos seem to be manned. I don't know. What would be the point of such a rule? *The non-driving cabs might just be occupied by engineering staff needing a lift to the work site. There are many practical advantages to manning both cabs - especially when you think how difficult it might be to get from one end of the train to the other when underground away from stations, for instance in reversing sidings. With normal trains the driver can walk through all the cars... Paul S I see what you mean. I read Recliner's post as meaning both cabs of each loco being manned. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"umpston" wrote in message
On 17 May, 22:26, "Paul Scott" wrote: umpston wrote: On 17 May, 16:04, "Recliner" wrote: "umpston" wrote in message (LUL engineering trains also usually have a battery or diesel loco at both ends - this also means the train can easily be reversed from locations where a crossover is not available.) Is it also the rule that both cabs must be manned? Whenever I've seen an engineering train pass, both cabs of the battery locos seem to be manned. I don't know. What would be the point of such a rule? The non-driving cabs might just be occupied by engineering staff needing a lift to the work site. There are many practical advantages to manning both cabs - especially when you think how difficult it might be to get from one end of the train to the other when underground away from stations, for instance in reversing sidings. With normal trains the driver can walk through all the cars... Paul S I see what you mean. I read Recliner's post as meaning both cabs of each loco being manned. Yes, that's exactly what I meant, as it's what I've observed, without knowing whether it's mandatory, customary or just accidental. But perhaps, as umpston suggests, they're actually engineering passengers rather than drivers. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wood Lane & Shepherds Bush Market | London Transport | |||
Shepherd's Bush Market, Wood Lane - H&C line developments | London Transport | |||
St Johns Wood or St John's Wood? | London Transport | |||
St Johns Wood or St John's Wood? | London Transport | |||
Wood Lane | London Transport |