London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 17th 10, 09:26 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,029
Default Wood Lane roundel returns

umpston wrote:
On 17 May, 16:04, "Recliner" wrote:
"umpston" wrote in message



(LUL engineering trains also usually have a
battery or diesel loco at both ends - this also means the train can
easily be reversed from locations where a crossover is not
available.)


Is it also the rule that both cabs must be manned? Whenever I've seen
an engineering train pass, both cabs of the battery locos seem to be
manned.


I don't know. What would be the point of such a rule? The non-driving
cabs might just be occupied by engineering staff needing a lift to the
work site.


There are many practical advantages to manning both cabs - especially when
you think how difficult it might be to get from one end of the train to the
other when underground away from stations, for instance in reversing
sidings. With normal trains the driver can walk through all the cars...

Paul S


  #2   Report Post  
Old May 17th 10, 11:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 222
Default Wood Lane roundel returns

On 17 May, 22:26, "Paul Scott" wrote:
umpston wrote:
On 17 May, 16:04, "Recliner" wrote:
"umpston" wrote in message




(LUL engineering trains also usually have a
battery or diesel loco at both ends - this also means the train can
easily be reversed from locations where a crossover is not
available.)


Is it also the rule that both cabs must be manned? Whenever I've seen
an engineering train pass, both cabs of the battery locos seem to be
manned.


I don't know. What would be the point of such a rule? *The non-driving
cabs might just be occupied by engineering staff needing a lift to the
work site.


There are many practical advantages to manning both cabs - especially when
you think how difficult it might be to get from one end of the train to the
other when underground away from stations, for instance in reversing
sidings. With normal trains the driver can walk through all the cars...

Paul S


I see what you mean. I read Recliner's post as meaning both cabs of
each loco being manned.
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 18th 10, 10:14 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,008
Default Wood Lane roundel returns

"umpston" wrote in message

On 17 May, 22:26, "Paul Scott" wrote:
umpston wrote:
On 17 May, 16:04, "Recliner" wrote:
"umpston" wrote in message




(LUL engineering trains also usually have a
battery or diesel loco at both ends - this also means the train
can easily be reversed from locations where a crossover is not
available.)


Is it also the rule that both cabs must be manned? Whenever I've
seen an engineering train pass, both cabs of the battery locos
seem to be manned.


I don't know. What would be the point of such a rule? The
non-driving cabs might just be occupied by engineering staff
needing a lift to the work site.


There are many practical advantages to manning both cabs -
especially when you think how difficult it might be to get from one
end of the train to the other when underground away from stations,
for instance in reversing sidings. With normal trains the driver can
walk through all the cars...

Paul S


I see what you mean. I read Recliner's post as meaning both cabs of
each loco being manned.


Yes, that's exactly what I meant, as it's what I've observed, without
knowing whether it's mandatory, customary or just accidental. But
perhaps, as umpston suggests, they're actually engineering passengers
rather than drivers.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wood Lane & Shepherds Bush Market Paul Scott London Transport 10 November 21st 06 03:37 PM
Shepherd's Bush Market, Wood Lane - H&C line developments THC London Transport 32 September 19th 06 10:05 PM
St Johns Wood or St John's Wood? JMUpton2000 London Transport 190 July 19th 06 02:11 PM
St Johns Wood or St John's Wood? Colin Rosenstiel London Transport 0 June 26th 06 03:01 PM
Wood Lane CIG_BIG_CIG London Transport 0 February 29th 04 11:27 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017