Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
1928 equipment causing commuter misery at Edgware Road Tube
On 7 June, 15:45, Michael Bell wrote:
In message ups.com * * * * * amogles wrote: On 6 Jun., 16:58, john wright wrote: "When there was only one line for the whole of London" What can that refer to? Neither telephones nor rail lines makes much sense in this context. When the various "lines" that now form the London Underground were built, they were separate railways and were referred to by their names, ie C&SLR etc. I assume that the practice of calling them lines must have come in when they were all part of London Underground. Does anybody know when the term "line" first came into use in this context There was a very interesting early history book about the London Underground called "Rails through the clay" by Croombe and Jackson, More recently, I was impressed with Christian Wolmar's book "the subterranean railway" which is a little more focussed on the economic, political and social aspects rather than the technological, but he certainly gives Yerkes some good coverage. which recounted how an American tycoon called Yerkes, who was a bit of a wide boy, but he also funded the biggest astronomical telescope of his day and had it called after himself, built the nucleus of the London Underground. It was originally going to be cable-hauled, hence the low profile. They were all nominally separate "lines" (an American term) though in fact all owned by Yerkes, and he also introduced the terms "northbound" and "southbound" to indicate direction of travel, which also have more an American sound than British. Now hang on a moment here, there are several independent events all being conflated into one. First of all, the only cable hauled line actually built was the Tower Subway, which was the first "deep bore" tube line, with a very small tunnel diameter indeed, and it did not last long, in part due to the opening of Tower Bridge. The same promoter who did the Tower Subway then came up with a more ambitious project linking the City with suburbs in South London, hence the name "City and South London Railway". It was planned to use larger tunnels than the Tower Subway (large enough that standard gauge track would fit), though still smaller than the current "tube" size. During construction, the decision was taken to install electric traction with locomotives rather than cable haulage. The design of the northern terminus, at King William Street had been made with cable haulage in mind, and the station was not well suited to electric operation, so the opportunity was taken when the line was extended northwards to replace it with a more suitable station at Bank. By the time Yerkes[1] came on the scene, the C&SLR, Waterloo and City and Central London Railway were all already operating [2], with different tunnel sizes and different electrification schemes. Yerkes bought the Metropolitan District, and bought a whole bunch of the schemes for underground railways that had received parliamentary approval after the success of the C&SLR, but had no money. He consolidate these into three railway companies: the Great Northern, Picadilly and Brompton Railway; the Charing Cross, Euston and Hampstead Railway; and the Baker Street and Waterloo Railway. Although each of these three, and the MDR, were run as separate companies, they were built to a common design, with the same electrification system (in the case of the MDR, only the electrification was the same). At this point, there are 6 tube lines, three in the Underground Group, one a subsidiary of the LSWR, and two independent. The Underground Group rectified this by buying the C&SLR and CLR, and converting them to Yerkes standard [3]. The other important thing that the Underground Group did was to introduce interavailable tickets and single unified branding. Both Yerkes, and Albert Stanley (later Lord Ashfield) both brought a significant amount of American terminology and ideas to the Underground Group, I don't think the use of "line" was one of them. [1] having first encountered this interesting character in print, I wondered for the longest time whether his name should be pronounced "yerks" (to rhyme with jerks) or "yerkees" (to rhyme with turkeys). I have since been told be someone I am prepared to trust in the matter that the second option is the correct one. [2] I can't remember off the top of my head when the Norther City line opened, but it may also have been around pre-Yerkes. [3] imperfectly in the case of the Central line, where the outer conductor rail is a bit higher than on other lines because of the way the tunnel linings were expanded. Robin |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|