![]() |
|
Cycle number plates
The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear
where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. |
Cycle number plates
On 31 July, 05:03, Basil Jet wrote:
The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Not very thorough. Shouldn't you have said "... a deliberate plan by Bob Crow to encourage benefit scroungers to think that they are as above the law ..."? |
Cycle number plates
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:03:42 +0100, Basil Jet
wrote: The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Of course it is. The idea that cyclists should be subject to the laws of the land is complete anathema to them. All cycles should carry clear identification plates so all miscreant riders can be reported to the police. |
Cycle number plates
On 31 July, 11:19, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:03:42 +0100, Basil Jet wrote: The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Of course it is. *The idea that cyclists should be subject to the laws of the land is complete anathema to them. All cycles should carry clear identification plates so all miscreant riders can be reported to the police. Er, did you actually read what you said "of course it is" to, before launching into a familiar rant about something else? |
Cycle number plates
On 2010\07\31 11:05, MIG wrote:
On 31 July, 05:03, Basil wrote: The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Not very thorough. Shouldn't you have said "... a deliberate plan by Bob Crow to encourage benefit scroungers to think that they are as above the law ..."? Er, did you actually read what you said "not very thorough" to, before launching into a familiar rant about something else? |
Cycle number plates
On 31 July, 15:22, Basil Jet wrote:
On 2010\07\31 11:05, MIG wrote: On 31 July, 05:03, Basil *wrote: The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Not very thorough. *Shouldn't you have said "... a deliberate plan by Bob Crow to encourage benefit scroungers to think that they are as above the law ..."? Er, did you actually read what you said "not very thorough" to, before launching into a familiar rant about something else? Yes. I saw it to be gratuitous abuse of those not connected with the observation you had made about issues not connected with the observation you had made, and felt that you could have widened it to cover more familiar issues and targets of such gratuitous abuse. I mean, why not? It would have made as much sense in the context of where the owner of a fleet of vehicles sticks the fleet numbers for the purpose of identifying members of their fleet. |
Cycle number plates
On 2010\07\31 16:58, MIG wrote:
On 31 July, 15:22, Basil wrote: On 2010\07\31 11:05, MIG wrote: On 31 July, 05:03, Basil wrote: The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Not very thorough. Shouldn't you have said "... a deliberate plan by Bob Crow to encourage benefit scroungers to think that they are as above the law ..."? Er, did you actually read what you said "not very thorough" to, before launching into a familiar rant about something else? Yes. I saw it to be gratuitous abuse of those not connected with the observation you had made about issues not connected with the observation you had made, and felt that you could have widened it to cover more familiar issues and targets of such gratuitous abuse. I mean, why not? It would have made as much sense in the context of where the owner of a fleet of vehicles sticks the fleet numbers for the purpose of identifying members of their fleet. I don't think I've complained about illegal behaviour by cycles more than once in my entire usenet career - apart from pedicabs, which are a royal PITA. |
Cycle number plates
On 31 July, 19:56, Basil Jet wrote:
On 2010\07\31 16:58, MIG wrote: On 31 July, 15:22, Basil *wrote: On 2010\07\31 11:05, MIG wrote: On 31 July, 05:03, Basil * *wrote: The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Not very thorough. *Shouldn't you have said "... a deliberate plan by Bob Crow to encourage benefit scroungers to think that they are as above the law ..."? Er, did you actually read what you said "not very thorough" to, before launching into a familiar rant about something else? Yes. I saw it to be gratuitous abuse of those not connected with the observation you had made about issues not connected with the observation you had made, and felt that you could have widened it to cover more familiar issues and targets of such gratuitous abuse. I mean, why not? *It would have made as much sense in the context of where the owner of a fleet of vehicles sticks the fleet numbers for the purpose of identifying members of their fleet. I don't think I've complained about illegal behaviour by cycles more than once in my entire usenet career - apart from pedicabs, which are a royal PITA. Fair enough, but it is common, and you picked a strange way to start. |
Cycle number plates
In message , Basil Jet
writes The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Not sure but I note that one has already appeared by me (zone 3, east London) in someone's front garden. -- Steve Fitzgerald has now left the building. You will find him in London's Docklands, E16, UK (please use the reply to address for email) |
Cycle number plates
On 31/07/2010 11:19, Bruce wrote:
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 05:03:42 +0100, Basil Jet wrote: The Borisbikes have identity numbers on both sides, but not on the rear where CCTV cameras might pick them up. I wonder if this is a deliberate plan to encourage people to think that they are as above the law on a Borisbike as they would be on their own bike. Of course it is. The idea that cyclists should be subject to the laws of the land is complete anathema to them. All cycles should carry clear identification plates so all miscreant riders can be reported to the police. Don't forgot pedestrians. What would be better - implants which can be scanned, or simple tattoos with ID numbers? And if there is an accident with a Borisbike, is it offensive to find out the number, as it is with trains? -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:52 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk