Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Thameslink
In message . li
Tom Anderson wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Bruce wrote: On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:42:00 +0100, "Recliner" wrote: "Bruce" wrote in message On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 16:33:21 -0700 (PDT), Mizter T wrote: On Aug 11, 11:06 pm, Neil Williams wrote: On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:45:20 +0100, Arthur Figgis wrote: If you are at King's Cross, the [well known UK city of] Cambridge might be quicker to get to by train than parts of Greater London. I've often made the point that, depending on where you're going to exactly, a commute to London from Milton Keynes or even Rugby may be quicker than one from somewhere within the Travelcard zones. Just don't tell Michael Bell that - he seems to think you can get from anywhere to anywhere in (Greater) London in less than an hour. In Ringby, it will only take twenty/ten/five/two minutes. And now he knows that 30 trains per hour is possible, no doubt this will be the service frequency on the Ringby Circle Line. Given that these trains will be double deckers with 3+3 seating, RingbyRail would have to employ Japanese-style "pushers" on the platforms to make sure that the passengers don't dawdle when boarding or alighting from the trains. Perhaps the trains could be equipped with arrival and departure 'pods' in which passengers would wait (1) at the stations to board, and (2) on the trains to alight. The pods could be swapped while the train speeds through the station using similar principles to the former Travelling Post Offices when picking up and setting down mail bags while on the move. Obviously the speed of the train would need to be reduced to ensure that passengers' internal organs were not ruptured during the pod exchange, but there would still be a considerable saving in time compared to having the trains stop. Well OBVIOUSLY the solution is that the trains maintain a constant speed through the stations, but that the pods accelerate and decelerate out of and into them. For trains travelling at 100 mph, pods changing speed at a comfortable 1 m/s^2 would take a touch under 45 seconds to go between moving and stationary in either direction, covering a cubit and a half less than a kilometre in doing so. So, allow about a mile of podway on either side of the station, and everyone will enjoy optimum travel time. You may jest but I found such a suggestion in a 1960s book about German proposals for a future ultra-high-speed rail service. -- Graeme Wall This address not read, substitute trains for rail Transport Miscellany at www.greywall.demon.co.uk/rail Photo galleries at http://graeme-wall.fotopic.net/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Exciting news on Thameslink 2000 (now "Thameslink Project") | London Transport |