Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 5, 3:32*pm, Chris wrote:
On 5 Apr, 10:51, bob wrote: The problem is the railways are not following a "keep calm, carry on" approach, they are following a "pack up and go home" approach, leaving passengers stranded. *There should be contingency plans for how to deal with the closure of key points on the network, ready to act on with half an hour's notice. *It should be clear to management within half an hour whether the situation is a "open again in a few minutes" or "closed for the rest of the evening" situation. Don't agree. A suicide could be cleared up in 30 minutes, it could take five hours (if the train couldn't be moved, for example), or any time in-between.....they DO NOT know until the BTP give NR the clearance - then they can start guesstimating. But the BTP, rightly in my view - sorry - refuse to guesstimate saying it'll take as long as it takes. Evidence would suggest that the disruption resulting from such an event will last for several hours. In the case of an evening disruption, it will likely persist until the end of services that day. THIS SHUOLD BE IN THE CONTINGENCY PLAN. Along with contacts at management of alternative routes, phone numbers for getting in coaches to bypass the closed section of line, instructions for posting this information on the display boards at Paddington, the phone number of the guy at Paddington who can make announcements over the PA system, and the phone numbers of people who need to get to Paddington to help stranded passengers. Your dealing with an horrific death here, not a broken down train. In terms of giving passengers information, adivce on alternative routes, and getting them past a closed line, it is irrelevant whether the line is closed because of a suicide, a collapsed viaduct or some gas bottles in a building fire. The effect on the passengers is the same, and the solution is the same. *For management to just sit on that information and neither pass it on, nor advise passengers (who may have train-specific non flexible tickets) how to go about getting home, nor give them advice on alternative routes that are available, is bad management. *Just sticking a "we're really sorry, your train is cancelled" message on the information display is not a contingency plan, and it's not keeping calm and carrying on. Yes, it is. The real problem is Joe Public's complete lack of patience these days. Previously, they'd work it out for themselves that the likely delay is a couple of hours, do I want to try a different route or shall I wait - but with the advent of e-everything, they expect instantaneous answers. The problem is the lack of customer service. Passengers are sold train-specific tickets with £100+ penalties for using the wrong train. Passengers may not know what alternative options might be available. Passengers might hope that the problem can be resolved reasonably quickly [1]. The railway company has the ability to arrange to have train specific tickets honoured on alternative routes (eg Waterloo-Reading, Waterloo-Exeter). The railway company knows what alternative routes exist. The railway has a reasonable estimate of how long the disruption is likely to last. There are several automated information distribution systems at Paddington that could provide this kind of information that were not used, and no attempt was made to inform the pitifully few staff on the ground of the information that passengers might want to know. [1] Lots of times when I was based in Cambridge, when I'd turn up at King's Cross to find some kind of problem on the next Cambridge train, I would have no idea whether it was a problem with this particular train, and I should wait for the next one, or if the whole ECML was screwed (eg wires down at Stevenage), and I should go to Liverpool Street. As someone who knows a bit about the railways, I could usually figure out, but on those occasions when going to Liverpool Street was the right solution, the lack of other people doing the same thing indicated that I was in a small minority. Well, in this case, someone's life comes before someone's trip home. But on a competently run railway, there should not be this either/or choice. The situation at Southall can be resolved, and passengers can get home on alternative routes, or by bus/coach. That this did not happen is due to bad management. BTW - THIS PERSON LIVED LASST NIGHT...... BUT YOU SAID IT WAS AN HORRIFIC DEATH |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington - ALL day Thurs / Fri | London Transport | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington - Friday Evening Rush Hour | London Transport | |||
MASSIVE DISRUPTION AT READING - SAT 28 / 1 / 2012 | London Transport | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington - Suicide at Hayes & Harlington | London Transport | |||
Massive Disruption at Paddington | London Transport |