Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 20, 11:58*am, Clive Page wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 14:00:52 +0100, "Paul Scott" SLL extension new works by Birse Metro. The contractor's site he http://www.overgroundextension.co.uk Is it reasonable to call it a "frequent" service if there are only 4 trains/hour? In broad terms I'd say yes. It is certainly a decent service level to begin a new rail service with. We're not talking about a tube line nor a tram line in an urban area where the UK expectation would be a service every few minutes. As Roland says many people would kill to have such a service level on their train or bus route. Talking a relevant Overground example - when the GOBLIN was every 20 or 30 minutes I would have to know the departure times as just missing a train would impose too long a wait and it would be worthwhile considering going another way. With the GOBLIN now every 15 minutes I am much more relaxed about "just turning up" although I do know the times anyway! The same applies for the Chingford Line - it's every 15 mins and it's not "the end of the world" if you just miss one. I guess it's all a bit psychological really in terms of people's tolerance of being delayed. -- Paul C via Google |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SLL alterations at Clapham Jn | London Transport | |||
Diversion of SLL services from London Bridge | London Transport | |||
Croxley Link news | London Transport | |||
Channel Tunnel Rail Link alignment to St. Pancras | London Transport |