On Jul 20, 1:44*pm, plcd1 wrote:


Talking a relevant Overground example - when the GOBLIN was every 20
or 30 minutes I would have to know the departure times as just missing
a train would impose too long a wait and it would be worthwhile
considering going another way. With the GOBLIN now every 15 minutes I
am much more relaxed about "just turning up" although I do know the
times anyway! * The same applies for the Chingford Line - it's every
15 mins and it's not "the end of the world" if you just miss one. *I
guess it's all a bit psychological really in terms of people's
tolerance of being delayed.


When the Tyneside metro switched from 6tph to 5tph I started looking
at the timetable before leaving the house and stopped thinking of it
as a turn up and go service. I don't think 4tph is really good enough
within inner London.

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

As a local to me example the Hertford East - Stratford service is only
hourly (!) off peak and at best half hourly in the peaks. OK

Not in the current M-F timetable, surely? Table 22 tells me there is no
off-peak service from Hertford East to Stratford, just half hourly to
Liverpool Street. There is also an hourly service from Stansted Airport or
Bishop's Stortford to Stratford. From Hertford you can connect into this
at various stations between Broxbourne and Tottenham Hale.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On 2011-07-20 21:39:18 +0000, Paul Corfield said:

On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:32:14 -0500,
wrote:

In article ,
(Paul Corfield) wrote:

As a local to me example the Hertford East - Stratford service is only
hourly (!) off peak and at best half hourly in the peaks. OK

Not in the current M-F timetable, surely? Table 22 tells me there is no
off-peak service from Hertford East to Stratford, just half hourly to
Liverpool Street. There is also an hourly service from Stansted Airport or
Bishop's Stortford to Stratford. From Hertford you can connect into this
at various stations between Broxbourne and Tottenham Hale.

sigh - so I got the northern destination wrong. The train service is
hourly from "somewhere" to Stratford. I am sure it used to be to /
from Hertford East. As I am only travelling between two stops I don't
care where it goes to beyond T Hale!

I should remember this place is pedant's corner.

A long, long time ago - when Stansted Airport station first opened -
there was an hourly stopper running Stansted Airport - Stratford -
Hertford East and vice versa, running both ways through Channelsea
Junction.

On Jul 20, 8:49*pm, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:02:20 -0700 (PDT), brixtonite









wrote:
On Jul 20, 1:44 pm, plcd1 wrote:

Talking a relevant Overground example - when the GOBLIN was every 20
or 30 minutes I would have to know the departure times as just missing
a train would impose too long a wait and it would be worthwhile
considering going another way. With the GOBLIN now every 15 minutes I
am much more relaxed about "just turning up" although I do know the
times anyway! The same applies for the Chingford Line - it's every
15 mins and it's not "the end of the world" if you just miss one. I
guess it's all a bit psychological really in terms of people's
tolerance of being delayed.

When the Tyneside metro switched from 6tph to 5tph I started looking
at the timetable before leaving the house and stopped thinking of it
as a turn up and go service. *I don't think 4tph is really good enough
within inner London.

Goodness me - give 'em a chance. The SLL service hasn't even started
yet and people are saying it's no good. I expect it to be popular when
it does start running but every time I make a suggestion or comment
about a train service proposal I get metaphorically "slapped round the
chops" and told I'm deluded / misinformed / stupid.

Many TOC services in Greater London run half hourly at best on certain
routes. Granted others are much more frequent on a core section but
then fan out to terminal stations at much lower frequencies. As a
local to me example the Hertford East - Stratford service is only
hourly (!) off peak and at best half hourly in the peaks. OK it is not
crush loaded but it is not exactly unpopular either. *I'd love a x15
minute as, I suspect, would many other people who would suddently
flock to use the line once it was a convenient option for them.

You see exactly the same thing with bus services in London. Bolster
frequencies to "turn up and go" levels and guess what - people turn up
to go.

--
Paul C

Didn't mean to complain exactly - the ELL extension to Clapham
Junction will be a huge improvement on what's currently available on
the SLL and I am sure it will be very popular. I just think it's a
shame it can't run to tube or DLR frequencies, and likewise for other
national rail routes in areas not served by the tube.

"brixtonite" wrote

Didn't mean to complain exactly - the ELL extension to Clapham
Junction will be a huge improvement on what's currently available on
the SLL and I am sure it will be very popular. I just think it's a
shame it can't run to tube or DLR frequencies, and likewise for other
national rail routes in areas not served by the tube.

When the Clapham Junction service starts the core section of the ELL
(Dalston Junction to Surrey Quays) will go up from 12 to 16 tph. On the new
section, ELL LO trains will have to share tracks with Southern trains
between Old Kent Road Junction and Peckham Rye, and with Southeastern and
freight between Crofton Road Junction and Wandsworth Road.

Peter

On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 01:13:40PM -0700, brixtonite wrote:

Didn't mean to complain exactly - the ELL extension to Clapham
Junction will be a huge improvement on what's currently available on
the SLL and I am sure it will be very popular. I just think it's a
shame it can't run to tube or DLR frequencies, and likewise for other
national rail routes in areas not served by the tube.

The trouble is that all those NR routes have lots of junctions, much of
the track is shared between several routes, and some of those routes are
longer distance ones to places like Brighton. This makes scheduling
lots of frequent services Challenging, and means that as soon as one
route goes wrong (like, say, something running late and missing its turn
at a junction) the problems rapidly cascade to lots of other routes. If
you have lots of junctions, you need large gaps between trains so you
can recover better from things like that. A reliable service is better
than a very frequent but unreliable service.

You will note that the Underground lines that have the most junctions
are those that run at the lowest frequencies and have the most
reliability problems, whereas those with few junctions run a much more
frequent and reliable service.

This is why when I grumble about the trains being packed between
Shepherds Bush and Clapham Junction, I maintain that the solution is not
a more frequent service, but longer trains.

SOME of the route conflict problems could be solved by reducing the
number of destinations served from each station, but many of them can't
be because of a lack of good interchanges. Taking just one example and
ignoring junctions further up the line, northbound trains from Thornton
Heath go to Victoria or London Bridge, diverging at Streatham Common.
You can't change that to a single route with a change of trains at
Streatham Common because both routes use the same platforms at Streatham
Common and there is no station at the right place on the line between
Mitcham and Streatham. See he
http://tinyurl.com/3ry5l2u

Streatham Common station is at the bottom, trains to Victoria head
north, trains to London Bridge take the curve from immediately north of
the platforms up towards the top right, where they join the line from
Mitcham (off screen on the left) and Streatham (off screen top right)
stations.

The *ideal* in this simplified example would be to move the station
north a bit and make it easy to change between Streatham Common High
Level and Streatham Common Low Level, getting rid of all the junctions.
Unfortunately in the real world there are other junctions in the area
and you won't get any benefit unless those are done away with too, and
replacing eleventy squillion stations, re-laying track as necessary,
buying and demolishing surrounding buildings - all thise would be
ridiculously expensive and time-consuming. Much easier to just have
longer trains to cope with the capacity problems in the peaks.

--
David Cantrell | top google result for "internet beard fetish club"

The word "urgent" is the moral of the story "The boy who cried wolf". As
a general rule I don't believe it until a manager comes to me almost in
tears. I like to catch them in a cup and drink them later.
-- Matt Holiab, in the Monastery