London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 18th 04, 10:06 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 18
Default Back to buses.

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:35:39 +0000, David Bradley
wrote:



No Sir, facts that were borne out in Vancouver who have sensibly opted
to purchase trolleybuses. If you want chapter and verse I will
happily provide it. Interesting that LPG refilling facilities can be
found on numerous forecourts but the refuelling plant proposed for
Hornchurch was refused planning permission, citing safety reasons, by
the London borough of Having. A fact you could look up.

Are you claiming that because Havering denied planning permission
there must be a danger? Same as mobile phone masts, and GM crops?

Look, I don;t know if you're right or not about the advantages of fuel
cell buses, but mentioning planning permissions makes no difference to
your case.
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 18th 04, 11:03 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 8
Default Back to buses.

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:06:08 +0000, Ken Wheatley
wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jan 2004 21:35:39 +0000, David Bradley
wrote:



No Sir, facts that were borne out in Vancouver who have sensibly opted
to purchase trolleybuses. If you want chapter and verse I will
happily provide it. Interesting that LPG refilling facilities can be
found on numerous forecourts but the refuelling plant proposed for
Hornchurch was refused planning permission, citing safety reasons, by
the London borough of Having. A fact you could look up.

Are you claiming that because Havering denied planning permission
there must be a danger? Same as mobile phone masts, and GM crops?

Look, I don;t know if you're right or not about the advantages of fuel
cell buses, but mentioning planning permissions makes no difference to
your case.


I wasn't aware that I was on trail, I though it was the introduction
and long term viability of Fuel Cell buses for London. The vehicles
on board fuel capacity is limited and therefore require more frequent
refilling than a diesel bus. To have facilities close to operations
must be desirable, so planning difficulties is a major issue even if
you wish to lightly dismiss this 'problem'.

The case I am presenting is straightforward, putting trolleybuses to
work on Route 25 would give more enviromental, sustainable benefits at
a lower cost than a Fuel Cell bus ever could. Open and shut case.

DAVID BRADLEY

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
We buy-back broken and damaged cell-phones of all brands. Thank you! London Transport 0 July 2nd 04 08:47 PM
June Underground News - the owl on the back cover John Rowland London Transport 1 May 29th 04 08:52 AM
Bendibuses back but .... David B London Transport 1 April 3rd 04 10:51 PM
I've been to London for business meetings and told myself that I'd be back to see London for myself. (rather than flying one day and out the next) I've used the tube briefly and my questions a Stuart Teo London Transport 4 January 30th 04 03:57 PM
trains into Waterloo - back to nomal? Tim London Transport 8 January 12th 04 06:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017