Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What's it(!) with Uber?
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 00:04:18 on Tue, 17 Jun 2014, JNugent remarked: Because I'm not talking about the status of the land, it could be owned by Father Xmas for all I care. What matters is whether it's "inside South Cambs" or "inside the City" for hackney-hailing purposes. All that's needed is a derogation which says that for taxi-hailing purposes it's deemed to be in both. Is that legally possible? Can one spot It only needs to be a small spot. Just the taxi rank would do. be in two districts simultaneously? It doesn't have to *be* in two districts at once. Just DEEMED to be FOR THE PURPOSES OF HACKNEY HAILING ONLY. Would occupants be liable to pay council tax to both district councils? And maybe a double-dose to the county? Of course not, it's only in South Cambs. Roland, Are you really proposing that local authorities should have the power to change the law as they see fit? Any law? What criteria would you apply for choosing which ones are changeable? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Uber app is not a taximeter | London Transport | |||
TfL Taxi Consultation to "kill" Uber | London Transport | |||
Uber driver nearly kills woman twice | London Transport | |||
Worst Uber ride ever | London Transport | |||
What's it(!) with Uber? | London Transport |