Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Basil Jet wrote: On 2014\06\19 07:53, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 18:40:27 on Wed, 18 Jun 2014, remarked: South Cambs is a collection of what we call "necklace villages" and their stations. I'm quite prepared to believe none [village High Streets or stations] are big enough to warrant a taxi. Arguably Whittlesford station would most likely merit a taxi rank. There might be one of the station forecourt of course. That would be non-statutory. NRES says: "Details of nearest taxis are shown on station information poster". https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/...e2ddce18?hl=en Quite. And we don't know if the driver was using that as a private car at the time. I could just about believe that, if a taxi driver were in the vicinity during rush hour, he might drop by to see if anyone wanted one, but Whittlesford is near-deserted at other times. Almost all regular users are commuters, who almost never use taxis (in the sense of looking out for one plying for hire). Regards, Nick Maclaren. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Uber app is not a taximeter | London Transport | |||
TfL Taxi Consultation to "kill" Uber | London Transport | |||
Uber driver nearly kills woman twice | London Transport | |||
Worst Uber ride ever | London Transport | |||
What's it(!) with Uber? | London Transport |