London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Crossrail 2 latest (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/14090-crossrail-2-latest.html)

eastender[_4_] October 28th 14 07:26 PM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
New site?

http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

E.


Basil Jet[_4_] October 28th 14 08:00 PM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
On 2014\10\28 20:26, eastender wrote:
New site?

http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

E.


If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end, why
cant the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly Circus at
one end?

Terminus at New Southgate? LOL. What are they playing at? If they are
going to Ally Pally at all, they should send half the trains to Gordon
Hill and half to New Barnet, and put a new station by the North London
Business Park while they are at it.

Roland Perry October 29th 14 06:38 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
In message , at 21:00:50 on Tue, 28 Oct
2014, Basil Jet remarked:
http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.


If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end,
why cant the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly Circus
at one end?


Is the TCR station allowed for in the design of Crossrail 1, or will
they have to dig it all up again?
--
Roland Perry

Recliner[_3_] October 29th 14 07:15 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:00:50 on Tue, 28 Oct 2014,
Basil Jet remarked:
http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.


If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end,
why cant the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly Circus at one end?


Is the TCR station allowed for in the design of Crossrail 1, or will they
have to dig it all up again?


Even if they've made some provision, squeezing in another set of large
platform and escalator tunnels under Tottenham Court Rd won't be easy.
Remember the "threading the needle" bit of the Crossrail documentary? That
suggests there isn't much spare space for more tunnels down there, so
presumably CR2 will have to go very deep, below the London clay.

Roland Perry October 29th 14 08:55 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
In message

, at 03:15:37 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Recliner
remarked:
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:00:50 on Tue, 28 Oct 2014,
Basil Jet remarked:
http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end,
why cant the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly
Circus at one end?


Is the TCR station allowed for in the design of Crossrail 1, or will they
have to dig it all up again?


Even if they've made some provision, squeezing in another set of large
platform and escalator tunnels under Tottenham Court Rd won't be easy.
Remember the "threading the needle" bit of the Crossrail documentary?


Yes, I had that in mind, although that was east-west and Crossrail 2 is
north-south, so perhaps it could run parallel to the Northern Line and
above Crossrail (which we know by the "eye of needle" thing is the same
depth as the Northern), and I think that means above the Central (at TCR
there's one set of escalators down to the central and an intermediate
concourse, then another set down to the Northern).

That suggests there isn't much spare space for more tunnels down there,
so presumably CR2 will have to go very deep, below the London clay.


--
Roland Perry

Recliner[_3_] October 29th 14 08:58 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
Roland Perry wrote:
In message
, at 03:15:37 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Recliner remarked:
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:00:50 on Tue, 28 Oct 2014,
Basil Jet remarked:
http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end,
why cant the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly
Circus at one end?

Is the TCR station allowed for in the design of Crossrail 1, or will they
have to dig it all up again?


Even if they've made some provision, squeezing in another set of large
platform and escalator tunnels under Tottenham Court Rd won't be easy.
Remember the "threading the needle" bit of the Crossrail documentary?


Yes, I had that in mind, although that was east-west and Crossrail 2 is
north-south, so perhaps it could run parallel to the Northern Line and
above Crossrail (which we know by the "eye of needle" thing is the same
depth as the Northern), and I think that means above the Central (at TCR
there's one set of escalators down to the central and an intermediate
concourse, then another set down to the Northern).

Of course, CR2 also has to cross the Northern line somewhere in that area.
Hopefully the much enlarged new concourse and interchange areas will be
able to cope with the extra CR2 load.

Roland Perry October 29th 14 09:11 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
In message

, at 04:58:23 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Recliner
remarked:
http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end,
why cant the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly
Circus at one end?

Is the TCR station allowed for in the design of Crossrail 1, or will they
have to dig it all up again?

Even if they've made some provision, squeezing in another set of large
platform and escalator tunnels under Tottenham Court Rd won't be easy.
Remember the "threading the needle" bit of the Crossrail documentary?


Yes, I had that in mind, although that was east-west and Crossrail 2 is
north-south, so perhaps it could run parallel to the Northern Line and
above Crossrail (which we know by the "eye of needle" thing is the same
depth as the Northern), and I think that means above the Central (at TCR
there's one set of escalators down to the central and an intermediate
concourse, then another set down to the Northern).

Of course, CR2 also has to cross the Northern line somewhere in that area.


And the Piccadilly (and further south the Circle and Victoria), but all
crossings could be arranged to be away from subterranean hot-spots like
TCR.

Hopefully the much enlarged new concourse and interchange areas will be
able to cope with the extra CR2 load.


--
Roland Perry

Recliner[_3_] October 29th 14 09:23 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
Roland Perry wrote:
In message
, at 04:58:23 on Wed, 29 Oct 2014, Recliner remarked:
http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end,
why cant the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly
Circus at one end?

Is the TCR station allowed for in the design of Crossrail 1, or will they
have to dig it all up again?

Even if they've made some provision, squeezing in another set of large
platform and escalator tunnels under Tottenham Court Rd won't be easy.
Remember the "threading the needle" bit of the Crossrail documentary?

Yes, I had that in mind, although that was east-west and Crossrail 2 is
north-south, so perhaps it could run parallel to the Northern Line and
above Crossrail (which we know by the "eye of needle" thing is the same
depth as the Northern), and I think that means above the Central (at TCR
there's one set of escalators down to the central and an intermediate
concourse, then another set down to the Northern).

Of course, CR2 also has to cross the Northern line somewhere in that area.


And the Piccadilly (and further south the Circle and Victoria), but all
crossings could be arranged to be away from subterranean hot-spots like TCR.

There's also underground rivers, sewers, gas and water mains, power and
telecoms cables, deep building foundations, various secret government
tunnels...

Basil Jet[_4_] October 29th 14 09:40 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 
On 2014\10\29 08:15, Recliner wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 21:00:50 on Tue, 28 Oct 2014,
Basil Jet remarked:
http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

If the Kings Cross station is going to stretch to Euston at one end,
why can't the Tottenham Court Road station stretch to Piccadilly Circus at one end?


Is the TCR station allowed for in the design of Crossrail 1, or will they
have to dig it all up again?


Even if they've made some provision, squeezing in another set of large
platform and escalator tunnels under Tottenham Court Rd won't be easy.
Remember the "threading the needle" bit of the Crossrail documentary? That
suggests there isn't much spare space for more tunnels down there, so
presumably CR2 will have to go very deep, below the London clay.


I don't think so... some years ago, they were saying that if CR2 was
going to be tube gauge it was going to have a station at Piccadilly
Circus, but that if it was going to mainline gauge it couldn't, because
there wouldn't be room for the larger station tunnels... which suggest
that the tunnels will weave through at approximately the same height as
unmoveable stuff already there, such as the Bakerloo and Piccadilly lines.

Robin9 October 29th 14 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eastender[_4_] (Post 145332)
New site?

http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything much.

E.

It certainly doesn't add to the Hackney/Tottenham Hale route the possibility of
a connection with London Overground at South Tottenham. Why not? Hasn't
TfL heard of London Overground? Is not the single biggest weakness of London
Overground the fact that it doesn't connect very often with other rail routes?

Mizter T October 29th 14 10:39 PM

Crossrail 2 latest
 

On 29/10/2014 16:06, Robin9 wrote:

'eastender[_4_ Wrote:
;145332']New site?

http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything
much.


(Tapped out on an ipad per chance?!)


It certainly doesn't add to the Hackney/Tottenham Hale route the
possibility of a connection with London Overground at South Tottenham.
Why not? Hasn't TfL heard of London Overground? Is not the single
biggest weakness of London Overground the fact that it doesn't connect
London Overground often with other rail routes?


Is it? Or is the single biggest weakness of LO that it's very convenient
for lots of people, and so perhaps liable to becoming a victim of its
own success...

(p.s. The above aside is not my considered verdict on the Crossrail 2
proposals, BTW!)

Graham Harrison[_2_] October 30th 14 09:26 AM

Crossrail 2 latest
 

"Paul Corfield" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:06:48 +0100, Robin9
wrote:


'eastender[_4_ Wrote:
;145332']New site?

http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything
much.

E.


It certainly doesn't add to the Hackney/Tottenham Hale route the
possibility of
a connection with London Overground at South Tottenham. Why not? Hasn't

TfL heard of London Overground? Is not the single biggest weakness of
London
Overground the fact that it doesn't connect very often with other rail
routes?


I think you're getting "hot under the collar" for no good reason.
While the precise station locations / designs are not yet fixed I have
certainly read that a connection to South Tottenham is certainly being
considered by TfL. Pretty sure this was in some of the early
documentation. This is on the basis that CR2 stations will be very
long and therefore required to be double ended. It is therefore
entirely plausible that one end of the station will link to the Seven
Sisters NR / LU station and the southern end can connect with South
Tottenham station.

TfL will certainly try, where it is feasible, to provide sensible
connections with other rail services when they build CR2. The main
problem is that the sheer scale of the stations makes them
ridiculously expensive which is why we have the palpable nonsense of
no intermediate stop between Dalston and Seven Sisters. Fast it may
be but convenient for local people certainly not. Ditto the lack of an
intermediate stop on Essex Road - "no demand" allegedly. Utter
nonsense. Have they no idea how busy the buses are along there?

The entire scheme is a mess dreamed up by a mix of business people and
politicians and then somehow forced into something that is sort of
justified in transport terms. It's completely the wrong answer to
adding capacity in North London and somehow relieving pressure on the
SW main line into Waterloo.

--
Paul C


What is the answer?


Robin9 October 30th 14 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mizter T (Post 145380)
On 29/10/2014 16:06, Robin9 wrote:

'eastender[_4_ Wrote:
;145332']New site?

http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything
much.


(Tapped out on an ipad per chance?!)


It certainly doesn't add to the Hackney/Tottenham Hale route the
possibility of a connection with London Overground at South Tottenham.
Why not? Hasn't TfL heard of London Overground? Is not the single
biggest weakness of London Overground the fact that it doesn't connect
London Overground often with other rail routes?


Is it? Or is the single biggest weakness of LO that it's very convenient
for lots of people, and so perhaps liable to becoming a victim of its
own success...

(p.s. The above aside is not my considered verdict on the Crossrail 2
proposals, BTW!)

Lengthening platforms to overcome the problems arising from LO being
popular will be a lot cheaper and a lot less work than constructing new
connections with other rail routes. The only practicable way of establishing
new connections will be by incorporating them into any new rail routes.

Robin9 October 30th 14 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul Corfield[_2_] (Post 145381)
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:06:48 +0100, Robin9
wrote:


'eastender[_4_ Wrote:
;145332']New site?

http://crossrail2.co.uk

Latest consulation report published here - can'ts e it adds anything
much.

E.


It certainly doesn't add to the Hackney/Tottenham Hale route the
possibility of
a connection with London Overground at South Tottenham. Why not? Hasn't

TfL heard of London Overground? Is not the single biggest weakness of
London
Overground the fact that it doesn't connect very often with other rail
routes?


I think you're getting "hot under the collar" for no good reason.
While the precise station locations / designs are not yet fixed I have
certainly read that a connection to South Tottenham is certainly being
considered by TfL. Pretty sure this was in some of the early
documentation. This is on the basis that CR2 stations will be very
long and therefore required to be double ended. It is therefore
entirely plausible that one end of the station will link to the Seven
Sisters NR / LU station and the southern end can connect with South
Tottenham station.

TfL will certainly try, where it is feasible, to provide sensible
connections with other rail services when they build CR2. The main
problem is that the sheer scale of the stations makes them
ridiculously expensive which is why we have the palpable nonsense of
no intermediate stop between Dalston and Seven Sisters. Fast it may
be but convenient for local people certainly not. Ditto the lack of an
intermediate stop on Essex Road - "no demand" allegedly. Utter
nonsense. Have they no idea how busy the buses are along there?

The entire scheme is a mess dreamed up by a mix of business people and
politicians and then somehow forced into something that is sort of
justified in transport terms. It's completely the wrong answer to
adding capacity in North London and somehow relieving pressure on the
SW main line into Waterloo.

--
Paul C

While I freely admit that my dislike of TfL is such that I get hot under the
collar quickly, I reject the idea that my point was intemperate or premature.

This thread is about the latest information put out about Crossrail 2, and
there is nothing in that information about a connection at South Tottenham.

You may be surprised to hear that I agree with your assessment of this
scheme and the forces behind it.


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk