London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   DLR alignment at bank (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/14349-dlr-alignment-bank.html)

[email protected] June 3rd 15 08:13 AM

DLR alignment at bank
 
Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some point?
If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the platforms east-west?

--
Spud


Roland Perry June 3rd 15 10:03 AM

DLR alignment at bank
 
In message , at 08:13:06 on Wed, 3 Jun
2015, d remarked:
Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some point?
If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the platforms east-west?


There are some 3D maps online. Normally this sort of thing is in order
to fit the line in, amongst existing infrastructure and where possible
under roads.
--
Roland Perry

[email protected] June 3rd 15 10:05 AM

DLR alignment at bank
 
In article , d
() wrote:

Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some
point? If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the platforms
east-west?


How else could the platforms be below those of the Northern Line?

--
Colin Rosenstiel

[email protected] June 3rd 15 10:32 AM

DLR alignment at bank
 
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:05:57 -0500
wrote:
In article ,
d
() wrote:

Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some
point? If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the platforms
east-west?


How else could the platforms be below those of the Northern Line?


Huh? They could cross them at 90 degrees obviously like many lines cross.

--
Spud



[email protected] June 3rd 15 11:59 AM

DLR alignment at bank
 
In article , d
() wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:05:57 -0500
wrote:
In article ,

d () wrote:

Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some
point? If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the
platforms east-west?


How else could the platforms be below those of the Northern Line?


Huh? They could cross them at 90 degrees obviously like many lines cross.


Not if they are to avoid being under buildings in King William Street? How
many have deep foundations?

--
Colin Rosenstiel

[email protected] June 3rd 15 01:22 PM

DLR alignment at bank
 
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:59:14 -0500
wrote:
In article ,
d
() wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:05:57 -0500
wrote:
In article ,

d () wrote:

Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some
point? If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the
platforms east-west?

How else could the platforms be below those of the Northern Line?


Huh? They could cross them at 90 degrees obviously like many lines cross.


Not if they are to avoid being under buildings in King William Street? How
many have deep foundations?


Dunno. But the DLR is pretty deep down. I'd be surprised if any buildings
had basements that deep, even the BoE. I don't know the depth but I'm guessing
its probably 100ft.

--
Spud



Basil Jet[_4_] June 3rd 15 01:36 PM

DLR alignment at bank
 
On 2015\06\03 14:22, d wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:59:14 -0500
wrote:
In article ,
d
() wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:05:57 -0500
wrote:
In article ,
d () wrote:

Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some
point? If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the
platforms east-west?

How else could the platforms be below those of the Northern Line?

Huh? They could cross them at 90 degrees obviously like many lines cross.


Not if they are to avoid being under buildings in King William Street? How
many have deep foundations?


Dunno. But the DLR is pretty deep down. I'd be surprised if any buildings
had basements that deep, even the BoE. I don't know the depth but I'm guessing
its probably 100ft.


It's not about the basements, it's about the foundations.


[email protected] June 3rd 15 03:25 PM

DLR alignment at bank
 
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 14:36:11 +0100
Basil Jet wrote:
On 2015\06\03 14:22, d wrote:
On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 06:59:14 -0500
wrote:
In article ,
d
() wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jun 2015 05:05:57 -0500
wrote:
In article ,
d () wrote:

Why does the DLR do a 90 deg turn just before it gets to Bank so its on
a north south alignment. Were there plans to extend it north at some
point? If not then surely it would have been simpler to bore the
platforms east-west?

How else could the platforms be below those of the Northern Line?

Huh? They could cross them at 90 degrees obviously like many lines cross.

Not if they are to avoid being under buildings in King William Street? How
many have deep foundations?


Dunno. But the DLR is pretty deep down. I'd be surprised if any buildings
had basements that deep, even the BoE. I don't know the depth but I'm

guessing
its probably 100ft.


It's not about the basements, it's about the foundations.


Its not near any skyscrapers so I doubt foundations that deep are an issue.

--
Spud



All times are GMT. The time now is 03:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk