Night tube
 

So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of the
sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?

--
Spud

Night tube
 

wrote:
So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of the
sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?

The new signalling system is delayed, but is finally due to be put in
during the next few years. Only after that will the Night SSL be possible.

Night tube
 

Not that it needs the signalling, rather the signalling engineers need night time shutdowns to put it in.

Overnight services are only being introduced on lines with no major engineering projects in the pipeline.

Night tube
 

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:17:04PM +0000, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of the
sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?
The new signalling system is delayed, but is finally due to be put in
during the next few years. Only after that will the Night SSL be possible.

Interesting that they don't even have plans to introduce night trains on
the Bakerloo.

--
David Cantrell | A machine for turning tea into grumpiness

You can't spell "slaughter" without "laughter"

Night tube
 

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:07:11 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:17:04PM +0000, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of the
sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?
The new signalling system is delayed, but is finally due to be put in
during the next few years. Only after that will the Night SSL be possible.

Interesting that they don't even have plans to introduce night trains on
the Bakerloo.

Most of the potential passengers are probably back under curfew by then.

--
Spud

Night tube
 

In message ,
Piatkow writes
Not that it needs the signalling, rather the signalling engineers need
night time shutdowns to put it in.

Overnight services are only being introduced on lines with no major
engineering projects in the pipeline.

Pity the Central Line finishes at Loughton. One more stop to Debden
(where some trains actually terminate ATM) would have got me home.
--
Bryan Morris
Public Key http://www.pgp.uk.demon.net - 0xCC6237E9

Night tube
 

In article ,
(David Cantrell) wrote:

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:17:04PM +0000, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of
the sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?
The new signalling system is delayed, but is finally due to be put in
during the next few years. Only after that will the Night SSL be
possible.

Interesting that they don't even have plans to introduce night trains on
the Bakerloo.

Since they aren't suggesting night trains anywhere without modern signalling
it will be a long time yet. You might as well complain the Waterloo & City
isn't mentioned.

In my book the absence of the Northern Line City branch is more surprising.
I know the City is still pretty dead outside office hours, but Old Street
and London Bridge?

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Night tube
 

wrote:
In article ,
(David Cantrell) wrote:

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:17:04PM +0000, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of
the sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?
The new signalling system is delayed, but is finally due to be put in
during the next few years. Only after that will the Night SSL be
possible.

Interesting that they don't even have plans to introduce night trains on
the Bakerloo.

Since they aren't suggesting night trains anywhere without modern signalling
it will be a long time yet. You might as well complain the Waterloo & City
isn't mentioned.

The Piccadilly Line certainly doesn't have modern signalling, and its
trains are only a few years newer than the Bakerloo's.


In my book the absence of the Northern Line City branch is more surprising.
I know the City is still pretty dead outside office hours, but Old Street
and London Bridge?

Perhaps because of the looming rebuilding of Bank station, with a new
southbound platform tunnel for the Northern line?

Night tube
 

On 2015\06\23 14:15, y wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:07:11 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:17:04PM +0000, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of the
sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?
The new signalling system is delayed, but is finally due to be put in
during the next few years. Only after that will the Night SSL be possible.

Interesting that they don't even have plans to introduce night trains on
the Bakerloo.

Most of the potential passengers are probably back under curfew by then.

Queens Park is full of luvvies! I've seen Jessica Hynes and Gordon
Kennedy use the station.

Night tube
 

On 2015\06\23 22:53, wrote:

In my book the absence of the Northern Line City branch is more surprising.
I know the City is still pretty dead outside office hours, but Old Street
and London Bridge?

And Angel.

Night tube
 

On 2015\06\23 23:01, Recliner wrote:
wrote:

In my book the absence of the Northern Line City branch is more surprising.
I know the City is still pretty dead outside office hours, but Old Street
and London Bridge?

Perhaps because of the looming rebuilding of Bank station, with a new
southbound platform tunnel for the Northern line?

That wouldn't stop them running northbound service via Bank and two-way
service via Charing Cross, would it?

Night tube
 

In message , at 07:52:21 on Wed, 24 Jun
2015, Basil Jet remarked:
In my book the absence of the Northern Line City branch is more surprising.
I know the City is still pretty dead outside office hours, but Old Street
and London Bridge?

Perhaps because of the looming rebuilding of Bank station, with a new
southbound platform tunnel for the Northern line?

That wouldn't stop them running northbound service via Bank and two-way
service via Charing Cross, would it?

Assuming they can cut the power off the two tracks independently. But
they probably need the northbound track for engineering trains to
service the works happening on the southern tracks
--
Roland Perry

Night tube
 

Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 07:52:21 on Wed, 24 Jun 2015,
Basil Jet remarked:
In my book the absence of the Northern Line City branch is more surprising.
I know the City is still pretty dead outside office hours, but Old Street
and London Bridge?

Perhaps because of the looming rebuilding of Bank station, with a new
southbound platform tunnel for the Northern line?

That wouldn't stop them running northbound service via Bank and two-way
service via Charing Cross, would it?

Assuming they can cut the power off the two tracks independently. But
they probably need the northbound track for engineering trains to service
the works happening on the southern tracks

Both directions will be closed for a few weeks, and the southbound for much
longer.

Night tube
 

On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 23:08:46 +0100
Basil Jet wrote:
On 2015\06\23 14:15, y wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:07:11 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:17:04PM +0000, Recliner wrote:
wrote:
So it looks like most of the tube lines will be running but none of the
sub surface lines. Anyone know why that would be the case?
The new signalling system is delayed, but is finally due to be put in
during the next few years. Only after that will the Night SSL be possible.

Interesting that they don't even have plans to introduce night trains on
the Bakerloo.

Most of the potential passengers are probably back under curfew by then.

Queens Park is full of luvvies! I've seen Jessica Hynes and Gordon
Kennedy use the station.

Really? Its obviously gone up in the world since I last had the mispleasure
of visiting that area. I guess its overspill from maida vale.

--
Spud

Night tube
 

Roland Perry wrote:

In my book the absence of the Northern Line City branch is more
surprising.
I know the City is still pretty dead outside office hours, but Old
Street
and London Bridge?

Perhaps because of the looming rebuilding of Bank station, with a new
southbound platform tunnel for the Northern line?

That wouldn't stop them running northbound service via Bank and two-way
service via Charing Cross, would it?

Assuming they can cut the power off the two tracks independently. But they
probably need the northbound track for engineering trains to service the
works happening on the southern tracks

They've certainly run a one-way service in the past during prolonged
engineering works and I think it was around that time that they put in a new
platform at London Bridge. However the equivalent on the Charing Cross
branch was to instead blockade Charing Cross to Kennington.

--
My blog: http://adf.ly/4hi4c