Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't understand why we keep seeing stories about unclaimed Oyster
money as though TFL is doing something wrong. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-10430319.html Clearly the deposit was necessary to cut down on people throwing the cards away. And clearly anyone can get their money back, even from aboard by mailing it. You can get a refund on the credit online if not the deposit. And the average credit on cards is only £3.74 a card in any case. About the only thing they could do is allow people to cancel the card completely online and get credit and deposit back. Am I missing something? E. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 01/08/2015 18:48, eastender wrote: I don't understand why we keep seeing stories about unclaimed Oyster money as though TFL is doing something wrong. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-10430319.html Clearly the deposit was necessary to cut down on people throwing the cards away. And clearly anyone can get their money back, even from aboard by mailing it. You can get a refund on the credit online if not the deposit. And the average credit on cards is only £3.74 a card in any case. About the only thing they could do is allow people to cancel the card completely online and get credit and deposit back. Am I missing something? The massive conspiracy that doesn't exist except in the minds of excitable / dim folk? Does it perhaps keep cropping up as the result of new FOI answers, or answers from TfL to London assembly members? I need to dig out that old card I've got with £30+ on it which snapped rendering it unusable... problem is I've no idea where I safely stashed it away! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 01/08/2015 18:55, Mizter T wrote: On 01/08/2015 18:48, eastender wrote: I don't understand why we keep seeing stories about unclaimed Oyster money as though TFL is doing something wrong. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/unclaimed-money-on-dormant-oyster-cards-soars-to-170million-10430319.html Clearly the deposit was necessary to cut down on people throwing the cards away. And clearly anyone can get their money back, even from aboard by mailing it. You can get a refund on the credit online if not the deposit. And the average credit on cards is only £3.74 a card in any case. About the only thing they could do is allow people to cancel the card completely online and get credit and deposit back. Am I missing something? The massive conspiracy that doesn't exist except in the minds of excitable / dim folk? Just a quick extra thought - Oyster's certainly better in this respect compared to the Netherland's OV-chipkaart. An anonymous, unregistered card costs €7.50 (which is in fact only a "suggested retail price" so a retailer could charge more), is "valid for 4 to 5 years" (bit vague!), and if you want to reclaim the left over credit it costs a €2.50 administration fee at a "public transport company counter". If there's a way of getting the money back by post without first getting a form from such a counter, they don't wish to advertise it!: https://www.ov-chipkaart.nl/aanvragen/welkekaartpastbiju/toeristen/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-08-01 18:04:50 +0000, Mizter T said:
Oyster's certainly better in this respect compared to the Netherland's OV-chipkaart. An anonymous, unregistered card costs €7.50 (which is in fact only a "suggested retail price" so a retailer could charge more), is "valid for 4 to 5 years" (bit vague!), and if you want to reclaim the left over credit it costs a €2.50 administration fee at a "public transport company counter". If there's a way of getting the money back by post without first getting a form from such a counter, they don't wish to advertise it!: That's because they expect you to go Dutch in the Netherlands. E. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01/08/2015 18:48, eastender wrote:
I don't understand why we keep seeing stories about unclaimed Oyster money as though TFL is doing something wrong. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/trans...-10430319.html Clearly the deposit was necessary to cut down on people throwing the cards away. And clearly anyone can get their money back, even from aboard by mailing it. You can get a refund on the credit online if not the deposit. And the average credit on cards is only £3.74 a card in any case. About the only thing they could do is allow people to cancel the card completely online and get credit and deposit back. Am I missing something? E. I get weekly e-mails with my journey history. My Oyster auto tops up when my credit reaches £8 (IIRC). On the few times that I have been overcharged, usually in times of train chaos, a simple call of less that five minutes has obtained a refund (usually next day). Once as I was on holiday I did not claim the refund in the next week, I received an e-mail telling me that I had not yet collected it. All in all, no problems. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is also a scandalous amount of unused money on the nation's debit cards. That money should be cleared out by the government and used to build hospitals.
|
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Offramp" wrote in message ... There is also a scandalous amount of unused money on the nation's debit cards. That money should be cleared out by the government and used to build hospitals. 90p of it's mine I have ever intention of spending it some day tim |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I remember reading somewhere that all of those unspent funds in Oyster accounts has to be listed in TfL's accounts as a liability. With hindsight, from the start of Oyster the Ts & Cs should have included a provision for unclaimed balances to eventually expire.
|
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Lewis wrote:
I remember reading somewhere that all of those unspent funds in Oyster accounts has to be listed in TfL's accounts as a liability. With hindsight, from the start of Oyster the Ts & Cs should have included a provision for unclaimed balances to eventually expire. I don't see a problem with the current regime. The balance on PAYG Oysters is shown in the accounts as part of short term creditors - along with the balance of travelcards and bus passes which are in the nature of payments in advance. The total for all those was £m357 in 2014. AFAICS that does no harm to TfL because it has of course had the money which goes into the pot of reserves of over £m4,000. So I am willing to trust to TfL's business (and political) judgment that it better to carry unspent balances on PAYG Oysters rather than incur the many costs of dealing with greater numbers of requests for refunds; and the costs of dealing with complaints (eg "your outrageous system did not just grab my £9 without warning but also stranded great aunt Agatha in her wheelchair at midnight - and her without a spare colostomy bag") - plus the reputational damage. 10 or 20 years from now I can see a case for a review but for now I'd let sleeping cards slumber on in peace. -- Robin reply to address is (meant to be) valid |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL Contactless - no funds in bank account? | London Transport | |||
Balham to Richmond - nothing sensible running! | London Transport | |||
BBC funds graffiti criminal | London Transport |