Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
As most people here must know, Chiltern runs one service a day, M-F,
to Paddington. It's run mainly for maintaining driver route knowledge for the occasions when Chiltern services are diverted to Paddington. It's not quite a parly service, as it runs at a convenient time, five days a week, but it's also not promoted and little used other than by rail enthusiasts (the few passengers are all sole males with cameras). And, yes, I was one of those this week, and here's the evidence: https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57654494380303 But it got me wondering if Chiltern could or should run more services into Paddington? Chiltern's services are growing steadily, with 2 tph Oxford services being added soon. The two-track route into Marylebone is congested, as are Marylebone's six platforms. Would it be possible to run, say, 2 tph into Paddington? There's obviously many constraints, including: - the single track sections on the neglected former main line from South Ruislip to Old Oak Common, which also sees occasional freight trains - the flat Old Oak Common West Junction to the GW relief lines - capacity on the relief lines into Paddington - Paddington platform availability. But might there still be room for a limited number of Chiltern services, maybe even at peak times? Once Crossrail starts, there will be more room in Paddington itself, but what about on the approach lines? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Not being a major rail enthusiast, I didn't know about this service. You describe it as "Chiltern to Paddington" but from where does it start? Surely further afield than West Ruislip? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
In message , at 18:24:12 on Wed, 5
Aug 2015, Robin9 remarked: Not being a major rail enthusiast, I didn't know about this service. You describe it as "Chiltern to Paddington" but from where does it start? Surely further afield than West Ruislip? No. http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/sear...08/05/0000-235 9?stp=WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=CH -- Roland Perry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
In article , (Roland Perry)
wrote: In message , at 18:24:12 on Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Robin9 remarked: Not being a major rail enthusiast, I didn't know about this service. You describe it as "Chiltern to Paddington" but from where does it start? Surely further afield than West Ruislip? No. http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/sear.../0000-2359?stp =WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=CH Looks pretty parliamentary to me. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
wrote:
In article , (Roland Perry) wrote: In message , at 18:24:12 on Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Robin9 remarked: Not being a major rail enthusiast, I didn't know about this service. You describe it as "Chiltern to Paddington" but from where does it start? Surely further afield than West Ruislip? No. http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/sear.../0000-2359?stp =WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=CH Looks pretty parliamentary to me. It does, but runs five days a week, unlike most parlys. It's there to maintain driver route knowledge, for whenever Chiltern has to divert to Paddington if Marylebone can't be used. The current version is Oyster-friendly, so it's used more than when it started from outside the London zones. So, by running a shorter service, Chiltern probably collects a bit more revenue from the Oyster pot. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
On 2015\08\06 02:36, Recliner wrote:
wrote: In article , (Roland Perry) wrote: In message , at 18:24:12 on Wed, 5 Aug 2015, Robin9 remarked: Not being a major rail enthusiast, I didn't know about this service. You describe it as "Chiltern to Paddington" but from where does it start? Surely further afield than West Ruislip? No. http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/sear.../0000-2359?stp =WVS&show=all&order=wtt&toc=CH Looks pretty parliamentary to me. It does, but runs five days a week, unlike most parlys. It's there to maintain driver route knowledge, for whenever Chiltern has to divert to Paddington if Marylebone can't be used. The current version is Oyster-friendly, so it's used more than when it started from outside the London zones. So, by running a shorter service, Chiltern probably collects a bit more revenue from the Oyster pot. I can't help thinking that giving the Greenford Branch over to Chiltern, extending all of the Greenford Trains to South or West Ruislip and half of them to Aylesbury via Princes Risborough to replace the current hourly service on that line, would achieve similar results in a better way. It would need a new platform to be built at Greenford though, and I'm not sure if the Greenford Branch still has chronic speed restrictions. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
Robin9 wrote:
'Recliner[_3_ Wrote: ;149717']As most people here must know, Chiltern runs one service a day, M-F, to Paddington. It's run mainly for maintaining driver route knowledge for the occasions when Chiltern services are diverted to Paddington. It's not quite a parly service, as it runs at a convenient time, five days a week, but it's also not promoted and little used other than by rail enthusiasts (the few passengers are all sole males with cameras). And, yes, I was one of those this week, and here's the evidence: https://www.flickr.com/photos/reclin...57654494380303 But it got me wondering if Chiltern could or should run more services into Paddington? Chiltern's services are growing steadily, with 2 tph Oxford services being added soon. The two-track route into Marylebone is congested, as are Marylebone's six platforms. Would it be possible to run, say, 2 tph into Paddington? There's obviously many constraints, including: - the single track sections on the neglected former main line from South Ruislip to Old Oak Common, which also sees occasional freight trains - the flat Old Oak Common West Junction to the GW relief lines - capacity on the relief lines into Paddington - Paddington platform availability. But might there still be room for a limited number of Chiltern services, maybe even at peak times? Once Crossrail starts, there will be more room in Paddington itself, but what about on the approach lines? Good photos. Thank you. Not being a major rail enthusiast, I didn't know about this service. You describe it as "Chiltern to Paddington" but from where does it start? Surely further afield than West Ruislip? It arrives empty, presumably from Marylebone or Wembley, at the down platform 3 at South Ruislip. I assume the Chiltern drivers all take turns on this service after bringing in a peak train to Marylebone, so they have up-to-date route knowledge. After the return trip to Paddington, it terminates at West Ruislip, and then sits empty there for 20 mins or so, as fast up trains pass by on the centre road, before an ECS move back to Wembley or Marylebone. It's immediately followed by a stopper to Marylebone, which I took. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
On 06/08/2015 00:44, Recliner wrote:
It arrives empty, presumably from Marylebone or Wembley, at the down platform 3 at South Ruislip. I assume the Chiltern drivers all take turns on this service after bringing in a peak train to Marylebone, so they have up-to-date route knowledge. Runs empty from Wembley LMD to South Ruislip as 5V35, forms 2V35 to Paddington, 2M30 back to West Ruislip, then 5H43 back to Marylebone, though that's only part of the unit's diagram for the day. The trains in question are only worked by Aylesbury drivers, and I believe they need a Guard as well. Cheers, Barry -- Barry Salter, usenet (at) southie (dot) me (dot) uk Disclaimer: The above do not necessarily represent the views of my employer. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
Barry Salter wrote:
On 06/08/2015 00:44, Recliner wrote: It arrives empty, presumably from Marylebone or Wembley, at the down platform 3 at South Ruislip. I assume the Chiltern drivers all take turns on this service after bringing in a peak train to Marylebone, so they have up-to-date route knowledge. Runs empty from Wembley LMD to South Ruislip as 5V35, forms 2V35 to Paddington, 2M30 back to West Ruislip, then 5H43 back to Marylebone, though that's only part of the unit's diagram for the day. The trains in question are only worked by Aylesbury drivers, and I believe they need a Guard as well. Yes, there was a guard. All he did was to walk through the train just before departure on each leg to check that we all knew where it was going. Everyone did -- that's why we were on it. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Chiltern to Paddington
On 2015\08\10 21:12, Barry Salter wrote:
On 06/08/2015 00:44, Recliner wrote: It arrives empty, presumably from Marylebone or Wembley, at the down platform 3 at South Ruislip. I assume the Chiltern drivers all take turns on this service after bringing in a peak train to Marylebone, so they have up-to-date route knowledge. Runs empty from Wembley LMD to South Ruislip as 5V35, forms 2V35 to Paddington, 2M30 back to West Ruislip, then 5H43 back to Marylebone, though that's only part of the unit's diagram for the day. The trains in question are only worked by Aylesbury drivers, and I believe they need a Guard as well. What use is a diversionary route that only a fraction of the drivers have the route knowledge for? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Paddington Bear at Paddington Station | London Transport | |||
Chiltern Services Between Amersham & Harrow | London Transport | |||
Chiltern & the online live departure boards | London Transport | |||
Chiltern line at Marylebone this Evening | London Transport | |||
Chiltern plans for West Hampstead | London Transport |