8pm, History Channel, Friday 19th March.

'Athens Subway'

Programme documenting the construction of the Athens Subway in time for
the 2004 Olympic Games. Programme charts the progress of the
construction and how the engineers had to work with archaeologists to
construct what has been dubbed 'A Metro Within A Museum'.

Sounds interesting.
--
Andrew
Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this
communication can not be guaranteed.
Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not
associations or companies I am involved with.

In article , Andrew P Smith
writes
'Athens Subway'

Programme documenting the construction of the Athens Subway in time for
the 2004 Olympic Games.

That wording is slightly misleading - Athens has had an underground
metro for some years. I presume they're talking about extensions for the
Olympics.

I remember one station where some of the passageways pass through Nth
century BC buildings, all left exactly where it was but carefully
illuminated and labelled behind glass).

--
Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address

"Andrew P Smith" wrote in message
...
8pm, History Channel, Friday 19th March.

'Athens Subway'



Oooh

And it's on the Hitler channel too !

In article , Clive D. W. Feather
writes
That wording is slightly misleading - Athens has had an underground
metro for some years. I presume they're talking about extensions for
the Olympics.

The last time I used the Athens subway was a few years ago but it was an
interesting experience to see their response to a train failure.

The train suddenly stopped between stations and only the emergency
lights stayed on. After a couple of minutes there was an announcement,
the gist of which a kindly local translated for us. Then the doors
opened, and in a fairly orderly fashion we all jumped or slid or were
helped to the ground; then we all trooped along to the nearest station,
all without the appearance of a guard or any obvious member of staff.
Some lights were on in the tunnel, so the evacuation wasn't at all
difficult. The nearest station was only a couple of hundred meters away
and fortunately for us was the one we had been planning to alight at; so
we just walked up the sloping end of the platform and exited normally.

I couldn't help thinking that in London, with a similar technical
failure, we'd probably have been trapped for hours. As it was, everyone
used their common sense and we all got out with only a small delay, and
only a few grumbled complaints.

--
Clive Page

Clive Page wrote:
In article , Clive D. W. Feather
writes
That wording is slightly misleading - Athens has had an underground
metro for some years. I presume they're talking about extensions for
the Olympics.

The last time I used the Athens subway was a few years ago but it was
an interesting experience to see their response to a train failure.

The train suddenly stopped between stations and only the emergency
lights stayed on. After a couple of minutes there was an
announcement, the gist of which a kindly local translated for us.
Then the doors opened, and in a fairly orderly fashion we all jumped
or slid or were helped to the ground; then we all trooped along to
the nearest station, all without the appearance of a guard or any
obvious member of staff. Some lights were on in the tunnel, so the
evacuation wasn't at all difficult. The nearest station was only a
couple of hundred meters away and fortunately for us was the one we
had been planning to alight at; so we just walked up the sloping end
of the platform and exited normally.

I couldn't help thinking that in London, with a similar technical
failure, we'd probably have been trapped for hours. As it was,
everyone used their common sense and we all got out with only a small
delay, and only a few grumbled complaints.

Mass unsupervised evacuation of passengers on to the track of a 3rd-rail
electrified railway doesn't sound like "common sense" to me. How did
people know the current wasn't about to come on again? Is the live rail
shielded?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

"Richard J." wrote in message
...
Clive Page wrote:

I couldn't help thinking that in London, with a similar technical
failure, we'd probably have been trapped for hours. As it was,
everyone used their common sense and we all got out with only a small
delay, and only a few grumbled complaints.

Mass unsupervised evacuation of passengers on to the track of a 3rd-rail
electrified railway doesn't sound like "common sense" to me. How did
people know the current wasn't about to come on again? Is the live rail
shielded?

Is it 3rd rail? The Moscow underground, for example, is overhead
electrified.
--
Terry Harper, Web Co-ordinator, The Omnibus Society
http://www.omnibussoc.org
E-mail:
URL: http://www.terry.harper.btinternet.co.uk/

"Terry Harper" wrote in message ...
"Richard J." wrote in message
...
Clive Page wrote:

I couldn't help thinking that in London, with a similar technical
failure, we'd probably have been trapped for hours. As it was,
everyone used their common sense and we all got out with only a small
delay, and only a few grumbled complaints.

Mass unsupervised evacuation of passengers on to the track of a 3rd-rail
electrified railway doesn't sound like "common sense" to me. How did
people know the current wasn't about to come on again? Is the live rail
shielded?

Is it 3rd rail? The Moscow underground, for example, is overhead
electrified.

No it isn't , its 3rd rail like most of the east european metro systems
(that mostly all use the same type of russian built train just as an aside).
I believe its 850V DC and is broad gauge but I'm not 100% sure.

B2003

"Boltar" wrote in message
m...
"Terry Harper" wrote in message
...
"Richard J." wrote in message
...
Clive Page wrote:

I couldn't help thinking that in London, with a similar technical
failure, we'd probably have been trapped for hours. As it was,
everyone used their common sense and we all got out with only a
small
delay, and only a few grumbled complaints.

Mass unsupervised evacuation of passengers on to the track of a
3rd-rail
electrified railway doesn't sound like "common sense" to me. How did
people know the current wasn't about to come on again? Is the live
rail
shielded?

Is it 3rd rail? The Moscow underground, for example, is overhead
electrified.

No it isn't , its 3rd rail like most of the east european metro systems
(that mostly all use the same type of russian built train just as an
aside).
I believe its 850V DC and is broad gauge but I'm not 100% sure.

B2003

Isn't Barcelona overhead electrified?