![]() |
Hello Ducky...
|
Hello Ducky...
On Monday, 9 May 2016 10:34:03 UTC+1, Someone Somewhere wrote:
As was predicted, has come to pass: protesters-leave-rubber-ducks-at-feet-of-controversial-kings-cross-statue-a3242661.html What is controversial about it? |
Hello Ducky...
On Mon, 9 May 2016 03:08:17 -0700 (PDT), Offramp
wrote: On Monday, 9 May 2016 10:34:03 UTC+1, Someone Somewhere wrote: As was predicted, has come to pass: protesters-leave-rubber-ducks-at-feet-of-controversial-kings-cross-statue-a3242661.html What is controversial about it? The absent mallard, which was part of the originally proposed sculpture. |
Hello Ducky...
In message , at 10:34:09 on Mon, 9 May
2016, Someone Somewhere remarked: As was predicted, has come to pass: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...ber-ducks-at-f eet-of-controversial-kings-cross-statue-a3242661.html That's very old news, people have been doing it ever since the statue was unveiled four weeks ago. -- Roland Perry |
Hello Ducky...
On 2016\05\09 11:49, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:34:09 on Mon, 9 May 2016, Someone Somewhere remarked: As was predicted, has come to pass: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...ber-ducks-at-f eet-of-controversial-kings-cross-statue-a3242661.html That's very old news, people have been doing it ever since the statue was unveiled four weeks ago. A duck nailed to the ground would be a trip hazard. |
Hello Ducky...
In message , at 14:43:18 on Mon, 9 May 2016,
Basil Jet remarked: As was predicted, has come to pass: http://www.standard.co.uk/news/londo...ber-ducks-at-f eet-of-controversial-kings-cross-statue-a3242661.html That's very old news, people have been doing it ever since the statue was unveiled four weeks ago. A duck nailed to the ground would be a trip hazard. It was close enough to the statue for that not to be an issue. -- Roland Perry |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:07 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk