![]() |
Tube chat
|
Tube chat
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 15:02:49 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote: I can't see this catching on: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/...n-provokes-hor or-among-london-commuters I've never really understood why some people seem to think travelling on public transport is any different to walking down the street with regards to personal communication. You wouldn't stop some random stranger in the street and try and have a chat with them unless you were mad, ****ed or on drugs, so why is a train any different? Just because I'm standing or sitting next to you doesn't mean I want to be your mate. -- Spud |
Tube chat
|
Tube chat
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... "Isn't it odd how people in lifts never speak to each other"... -- Roland Perry Not really. The reluctance to engage naturally increases with the decrease in disengagement options. PA |
Tube chat
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 17:44:16 +0100
"Peter Able" wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... "Isn't it odd how people in lifts never speak to each other"... -- Roland Perry Not really. The reluctance to engage naturally increases with the decrease in disengagement options. Unfortunately there are a - luckily tiny - minority of people who think proximity should equate to familiarity. -- Spud |
Tube chat
On Friday, 30 September 2016 10:25:37 UTC+1, sp @potato.field wrote:
Unfortunately there are a - luckily tiny - minority of people who think proximity should equate to familiarity. Often actors and actresses building resumés. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:04 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk