About Us

[email protected] · February 22nd 17, 11:08 PM posted to uk.transport.london

In article
-september
..org, (Recliner) wrote:

wrote:
In article , d ()
wrote:

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:58:50 -0600
wrote:
In article , d () wrote:
AFAIK tube trains are all owned outright by LU. Is this not the case
with the 378s on LO then?

London Overground is quite different to LUL. It is operated as a
concession, not by a TfL operator directly.

In that case I can't help wondering if the service would be better if
TfL ran it directly.

The main reason is that in general TfL don't own the tracks which
in some cases are shared with TOCs. Another reason is that your
Tory friends don;t like state enterprise.

The main, reason, surely, is to keep the strike-prone LU unions away
from LO and the DLR?

Now you come to mention it.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
GOSPEL Electrification	Robin9	London Transport	71	February 28th 17 09:02 PM
GOSPEL Electrification	[email protected]	London Transport	0	February 21st 17 11:36 PM
Gospel Oak-Barking	Andrea	London Transport	16	March 8th 07 07:37 PM
SPECS installation in Gospel Oak?	John Rowland	London Transport	1	April 15th 06 09:52 AM
Gospel Oak - Barking	Slim	London Transport	1	July 21st 04 12:26 PM

Menu

About Us