![]() |
Clapham omnibus (rather than the man on one)
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...shops-on-busy-
south-london-high-street-a3608216.html. No mob to be seen. -- Roland Perry |
Clapham omnibus (rather than the man on one)
On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 09:34:10 +0100
Roland Perry wrote: https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...shops-on-busy- south-london-high-street-a3608216.html. There's probably a good argument to be made for the sort of alarm that looks for a drivers eyes and goes off if it can't see them that you get in some high end cars to be made compulsory in large vehicles along with emergency braking after a few seconds of no response to the alarm. -- Spud |
Clapham omnibus (rather than the man on one)
On 10.08.2017 11:34 AM, Roland Perry wrote:
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/lond...shops-on-busy- south-london-high-street-a3608216.html. No mob to be seen. One wonders if the consequent RAIB report will suggest that buses should be fitted with basic safety features that we should be astonished aren't already fitted, given they are expected on mainline trains? Hold on... |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk