London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Paddington C5 program (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/15485-paddington-c5-program.html)

[email protected] October 24th 17 08:43 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't expect
much to happen at 5mph.


Recliner[_3_] October 24th 17 08:51 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
wrote:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't expect
much to happen at 5mph.


The series actually started about a month ago.


[email protected] October 24th 17 09:29 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 08:51:24 -0000 (UTC)
Recliner wrote:
wrote:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't

expect
much to happen at 5mph.


The series actually started about a month ago.


What can I say, I don't watch much TV. It said it was new on the schedule, I
guess they just meant the program, not the series.



Roland Perry October 24th 17 09:46 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
In message , at 10:28:13 on
Tue, 24 Oct 2017, remarked:

The way these TV companies describe their series is not always clear.
I think on our PVR guide the present episodes are described as new in
a manner that on first glance may look like it is a new series being
introduced, when what they must mean it is a new episode.


Then there's the curious concept of "all new" TV programmes.

Anyway, I'm watching the Paddington series on Ch5 catch-up, and while
the derailed train has shown up in trailers attached to earlier
programmes in the series, I haven't got as far as this actual episode
yet.
--
Roland Perry

Someone Somewhere October 24th 17 10:01 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
On 24/10/2017 09:43, wrote:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't expect
much to happen at 5mph.

Strangely enough it was one of the few bits of TV I've watched recently
and I agree it was pretty interesting.

I do wonder with Paddington (and other covered stations where there will
be no weather to deal with the waste) whether it would be possible to
have installed some form of drainage underneath where the toilets are
when the train stops (I know it's not exact, but some kind of trough in
the rough location with a flushing mechanism could do the job and not
leave it festering).

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....

[email protected] October 24th 17 10:10 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:01:55 +0100
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 24/10/2017 09:43, wrote:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't

expect
much to happen at 5mph.

Strangely enough it was one of the few bits of TV I've watched recently
and I agree it was pretty interesting.

I do wonder with Paddington (and other covered stations where there will
be no weather to deal with the waste) whether it would be possible to
have installed some form of drainage underneath where the toilets are
when the train stops (I know it's not exact, but some kind of trough in
the rough location with a flushing mechanism could do the job and not
leave it festering).


Or just have the toilets locked out of use at termini.

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....


That would be the best solution, or at the very least something that captures
the solid waste but lets the fluids out if space is an issue.



Someone Somewhere October 24th 17 12:12 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
On 24/10/2017 12:09, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:01:55 +0100, Someone Somewhere
wrote:


I do wonder with Paddington (and other covered stations where there will
be no weather to deal with the waste) whether it would be possible to
have installed some form of drainage underneath where the toilets are
when the train stops (I know it's not exact, but some kind of trough in
the rough location with a flushing mechanism could do the job and not
leave it festering).

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....


What trains are left without now? HST with only a few more years use
and what else. So a problem that has been around for over a century
isn't really worth spending much money on for the last few years that
the situation exists.


Yes - sorry - I meant to imply in the distant past rather than recently
(in my defence I did say "to have installed" rather than in the current
or future tense)

Roland Perry October 24th 17 01:08 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
In message , at 12:09:41 on
Tue, 24 Oct 2017, remarked:

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....


What trains are left without now? HST with only a few more years use
and what else.


IC225? (Yes, I know, they don't operate at Paddington).
--
Roland Perry

Anna Noyd-Dryver October 24th 17 01:27 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 12:09:41 on
Tue, 24 Oct 2017, remarked:

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....


What trains are left without now? HST with only a few more years use
and what else.


IC225? (Yes, I know, they don't operate at Paddington).


Weren't they built with retention tanks?


Anna Noyd-Dryver


Roland Perry October 24th 17 02:06 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
In message , at 13:27:32 on Tue, 24 Oct
2017, Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked:

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....

What trains are left without now? HST with only a few more years use
and what else.


IC225? (Yes, I know, they don't operate at Paddington).


Weren't they built with retention tanks?


It seems they were.

--
Roland Perry

Graeme Wall October 24th 17 03:29 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
On 24/10/2017 11:10, wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:01:55 +0100
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 24/10/2017 09:43,
wrote:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't

expect
much to happen at 5mph.

Strangely enough it was one of the few bits of TV I've watched recently
and I agree it was pretty interesting.

I do wonder with Paddington (and other covered stations where there will
be no weather to deal with the waste) whether it would be possible to
have installed some form of drainage underneath where the toilets are
when the train stops (I know it's not exact, but some kind of trough in
the rough location with a flushing mechanism could do the job and not
leave it festering).


Or just have the toilets locked out of use at termini.



"Do not use the adjacent apparatus while the train is standing in the
station."



--
Graeme Wall
This account not read.


[email protected] October 24th 17 09:04 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
In article , () wrote:

A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't
expect much to happen at 5mph.


The problem wasn't just the rotten sleepers but whoever thought that right
next to the trap points was a good place to locate a vital electrification
gantry.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

[email protected] October 24th 17 09:04 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
In article , (Someone
Somewhere) wrote:

On 24/10/2017 09:43,
wrote:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video
of the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having
to work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to
rotten sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they
didn't expect much to happen at 5mph.

Strangely enough it was one of the few bits of TV I've watched
recently and I agree it was pretty interesting.

I do wonder with Paddington (and other covered stations where there
will be no weather to deal with the waste) whether it would be
possible to have installed some form of drainage underneath where the
toilets are when the train stops (I know it's not exact, but some
kind of trough in the rough location with a flushing mechanism could
do the job and not leave it festering).

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....


I don't know about Paddington but I've seen large metal trays in the 4 foot
at other stations, presumably to catch some of the debris. However, the
Paddington derailment was out of the platforms so trays in the platforms
wouldn't help, presumably.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

[email protected] October 24th 17 09:30 PM

Paddington C5 program
 
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:01:55 +0100, Someone Somewhere
wrote:

On 24/10/2017 09:43, wrote:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't expect
much to happen at 5mph.

Strangely enough it was one of the few bits of TV I've watched recently
and I agree it was pretty interesting.

I do wonder with Paddington (and other covered stations where there will
be no weather to deal with the waste) whether it would be possible to
have installed some form of drainage underneath where the toilets are
when the train stops (I know it's not exact, but some kind of trough in
the rough location with a flushing mechanism could do the job and not
leave it festering).


I woukd have thought it would be an ideal location for concrete slab
track. They could have put a drainage channel up the middle so it
woukd just need a quick hose down. The program mentioned having to
break up concrete to remove the sleepers anyway. Anyone know why
timber longitudinal sleepers are in use in parts of Paddington?

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com


Graham Murray October 25th 17 05:23 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
writes:

In article ,
() wrote:

A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video of
the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having to
work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to rotten
sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they didn't
expect much to happen at 5mph.


The problem wasn't just the rotten sleepers but whoever thought that right
next to the trap points was a good place to locate a vital electrification
gantry.


I think you are referring to a different derailment. This one was where
the rear power car of an HST derailed as it was pulling out of platform
2. Not the one where an incoming ECS 'turbo' SPAd'd when approaching
platform 1.

Roland Perry October 25th 17 07:01 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
In message , at 16:04:54
on Tue, 24 Oct 2017, remarked:
A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video
of the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was pretty
interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers having
to work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread due to
rotten sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I guess they
didn't expect much to happen at 5mph.

Strangely enough it was one of the few bits of TV I've watched
recently and I agree it was pretty interesting.

I do wonder with Paddington (and other covered stations where there
will be no weather to deal with the waste) whether it would be
possible to have installed some form of drainage underneath where the
toilets are when the train stops (I know it's not exact, but some
kind of trough in the rough location with a flushing mechanism could
do the job and not leave it festering).

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....


I don't know about Paddington but I've seen large metal trays in the 4 foot
at other stations, presumably to catch some of the debris. However, the
Paddington derailment was out of the platforms


No it wasn't:

http://metro.co.uk/2017/08/20/train-...leaves-london-
paddington-station-6865539/

so trays in the platforms wouldn't help, presumably.


--
Roland Perry

[email protected] October 25th 17 08:49 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
In article , (Graham
Murray) wrote:

writes:

In article ,
()
wrote:

A series about Paddington station started last night. They showed video
of the HST derailment there along with recovery efforts which was
pretty interesting and enlightening (especially the poor track workers
having to work in human waste). Apparently the cause was track spread
due to rotten sleepers. You'd think someone might have checked but I
guess they didn't expect much to happen at 5mph.


The problem wasn't just the rotten sleepers but whoever thought
that right next to the trap points was a good place to locate a
vital electrification gantry.


I think you are referring to a different derailment. This one was where
the rear power car of an HST derailed as it was pulling out of platform
2. Not the one where an incoming ECS 'turbo' SPAd'd when approaching
platform 1.


Oh, yes! Silly me!

--
Colin Rosenstiel

BirchangerKen October 25th 17 10:03 AM

Paddington C5 program
 
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 14:08:53 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote:

In message , at 12:09:41 on
Tue, 24 Oct 2017, remarked:

Or of course retrofit the trains with storage tanks....


What trains are left without now? HST with only a few more years use
and what else.


IC225? (Yes, I know, they don't operate at Paddington).


317 (which did, once, have tanks).

What about pacers/sprinters?


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk