Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chetoph" wrote in message
m... The idea of linking stations up in London is a good idea but it's probably best to start of with closer links rather than starting with two substantially far away from each other. Linking Moorgate to Cannon Street and Waterloo to Waterloo East (or destroying it) would offer plenty of benefits. Yes they would be complicated and expensive, but I'm sure (well guessing) that they would be under or the same price as Crossrail. Not sure about the Waterloo one - a line already exists, but I'm not sure how much use it is - but from discussions I've seen here in the past, the Moorgate to Cannon Street is a non-starter: there's too much difference in height, and the Bank of England vaults in the way. Would it be possible to run a line slightly further east, from Moorgate under Throgmorton, perhaps with new Bank/Moorgate platforms somewhere around Birchin Lane, to a new underground station at the eastern end of London Bridge station, with a portal somewhere in the vicinity of Southwark Park Road. The line could take over services on the East Dulwich line. There may even be room for a new stop somewhere around the bottom of Bermondsey Street, as that area's not brilliantly served by the tube. (Yes, I'm biased because I live in it, so sue me.) Or is this a complete impossibility because of the way the vaults are positioned? Just a thought. Jonn |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jonn Elledge wrote:
"Chetoph" wrote... The idea of linking stations up in London is a good idea but it's probably best to start of with closer links rather than starting with two substantially far away from each other. Linking Moorgate to Cannon Street and Waterloo to Waterloo East (or destroying it) would offer plenty of benefits. Yes they would be complicated and expensive, but I'm sure (well guessing) that they would be under or the same price as Crossrail. Not sure about the Waterloo one - a line already exists, but I'm not sure how much use it is - but from discussions I've seen here in the past, the Moorgate to Cannon Street is a non-starter: there's too much difference in height, and the Bank of England vaults in the way. Would it be possible to run a line slightly further east, from Moorgate under Throgmorton, perhaps with new Bank/Moorgate platforms somewhere around Birchin Lane, to a new underground station at the eastern end of London Bridge station, The main obstacle in that area is not vaults nor gradients - it's foundations! Many City buildings (especially the taller ones) have foundations that go down a very long way, preventing any tube line from getting through. A new underground station at the eastern end of London Bridge station could also be a problem for the same reason. All those new groundscrapers around Tooley Street may prevent the construction of any new tunnels. The only possible route I can see (apart from beneath the existing lines) is under Gracechurch Street and Bishopsgate, giving interchange with Liverpool Street station instead of Moorgate. I don't know how easily it could be linked to Old Street, though. with a portal somewhere in the vicinity of Southwark Park Road. The line could take over services on the East Dulwich line. There may even be room for a new stop somewhere around the bottom of Bermondsey Street, as that area's not brilliantly served by the tube. (Yes, I'm biased because I live in it, so sue me.) If you're going to link it to the East Dulwich line, it would be better to make it more direct. Instead of detouring through South Bermondsey and Peckham, it could go south through Walworth, Camberwell and Denmark Hill. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Aidan Stanger
writes The main obstacle in that area is not vaults nor gradients - it's foundations! Many City buildings (especially the taller ones) have foundations that go down a very long way, preventing any tube line from getting through. However, planning has taken this into account, with gaps being left in the lines of buildings. One of the constraints of the route of Crossrail is threading it through the existing gaps in the building line in the City. -- Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:12:04 +0000 (UTC), "Jonn Elledge"
wrote: Not sure about the Waterloo one - a line already exists, but I'm not sure how much use it is - but from discussions I've seen here in the past, the Moorgate to Cannon Street is a non-starter: there's too much difference in height, and the Bank of England vaults in the way. Leaving aside other issues, could the Bank vaults not be moved somewhere else, if such a line was really wanted? (If there is anything worth having in there, I'll look after it...!) -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |