London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 9th 04, 04:04 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2004
Posts: 3
Default "Cassio Metro" - the new group of buildings next to Watford Met


It just seemed to me that the developers who are building these
buildings wouldn't mind a train station right next door...


Nor even a railway station. :-)



OOPS!

/me must remember the distinction next time.


There's a difference?
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 13th 04, 02:48 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2004
Posts: 2
Default "Cassio Metro" - the new group of buildings next to Watford Met



It just seemed to me that the developers who are building these
buildings wouldn't mind a train station right next door...

Nor even a railway station. :-)



OOPS!

/me must remember the distinction next time.


There's a difference?


a railway station has platforms laid next to a railway a train station has
actual trains not underground tubes call at it


  #3   Report Post  
Old May 13th 04, 06:50 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2004
Posts: 3
Default "Cassio Metro" - the new group of buildings next to Watford Met

Mark Fried wrote:
It just seemed to me that the developers who are building these
buildings wouldn't mind a train station right next door...

Nor even a railway station. :-)


OOPS!

/me must remember the distinction next time.


There's a difference?



a railway station has platforms laid next to a railway a train station has
actual trains not underground tubes call at it



THank you, never knew that
  #4   Report Post  
Old May 13th 04, 09:04 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default "Cassio Metro" - the new group of buildings next to Watford Met

"Robinson" wrote in message
...
Mark Fried wrote:

a railway station has platforms laid next to a
railway a train station has actual trains not
underground tubes call at it


THank you, never knew that


A piece of advice - never trust the definition of a word from someone who
can't capitalise or punctuate.

There is no difference between a railway station and a train station, but
some people in Britain prefer the former. The BBC seem to prefer the latter,
because BBC journos can occasionally be heard saying "a railway sta- er, a
train station"

--
John Rowland - Spamtrapped
Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html
A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood.
That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line -
It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 13th 04, 08:43 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2004
Posts: 36
Default "Cassio Metro" - the new group of buildings next to Watford Met


"Mark Fried" wrote in message
...

a railway station has platforms laid next to a railway a train station has
actual trains not underground tubes call at it


What do you mean by actual trains? Is there a reason why tube trains aren't
"actual trains"? More importantly, is there any reason why the subsurface
trains that serve Watford Met. aren't "actual trains"?





  #6   Report Post  
Old May 13th 04, 11:37 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 515
Default "Cassio Metro" - the new group of buildings next to Watford Met

"Solar Penguin" wrote
the following in:


"Mark Fried" wrote in message
...

a railway station has platforms laid next to a railway a train
station has actual trains not underground tubes call at it


What do you mean by actual trains? Is there a reason why tube
trains aren't "actual trains"? More importantly, is there any
reason why the subsurface trains that serve Watford Met. aren't
"actual trains"?


When I was a child it puzzled me greatly that the Newsroom Southeast
travel news always talked about trains and then the tube as if the tube
wasn't a railway with trains running on it.

--
message by Robin May, but I would say that, wouldn't I?
"GIVE IN! IT'S TIME TO GO!" - The NHS offers a high standard of care.

"You MUST NOT drive dangerously" - the Highway Code
Spelling lesson: then and than are different words.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Baker St.(Met) and Met operations [email protected] London Transport 19 October 16th 11 02:35 PM
NEW GROUP - Eco Friendly low carbon executive cars chauffeur services to be designed for and with the Business Community - we seek your views - contact the group or new website today... [email protected] London Transport 0 April 29th 07 12:13 PM
big blue buildings darsy London Transport 8 March 15th 06 07:18 AM
Met/Chiltern lines next weekend daveb London Transport 11 June 17th 05 08:11 PM
New(ish) book: "Britain's Historic Railway Buildings: An Oxford Gazetteer of Structures and Sites" John Rowland London Transport 1 September 11th 03 05:28 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:13 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017