Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For once I agree with Caroline Pidgeon. It's inexcusable that
until quite recently we were being told that Crossrail was on schedule and everything was proceeding smoothly. I think the flannel merchants - the more uncouth expression is better - should be identified and their careers affected. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:06:30 +0000, Robin9
wrote: For once I agree with Caroline Pidgeon. It's inexcusable that until quite recently we were being told that Crossrail was on schedule and everything was proceeding smoothly. I think the flannel merchants - the more uncouth expression is better - should be identified and their careers affected. The FT had an analysis a month or so ago. One of the things it disclosed, which I'd not previously heard, was that Crossrail Ltd was structured to minimise the opportunities for political meddling. So, TfL and the DfT only had one representative each on the board, and basically the management was allowed to get on with its job so long as the project was running well, defined as being on time and on or below budget. What the cunning devisers of this structure had presumably failed to anticipate was that it gave the management a very strong incentive to keep saying that the project was indeed on time and below budget long after that had ceased to be entirely correct. Only when they couldn't hide the problems any longer did they start owning up to the fact that it was at least months late, and that all the budget contingencies had been used up. Initially, they tried to blame it on the exploding transformer, but it's now clear that at least some of the stations are many months late, and that the tunnels only became ready for test running in January, a month after the line was supposed to have opened. So, although the 345s were late, and weren't capable of test running through the tunnels until quite recently, that's not the main cause of the delay. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 11:06:30 +0000
Robin9 wrote: For once I agree with Caroline Pidgeon. It's inexcusable that until quite recently we were being told that Crossrail was on schedule and everything was proceeding smoothly. I think the flannel merchants - the more uncouth expression is better - should be identified and their careers affected. Interestingly the shops on sub level 3 at the crossrail station at canary wharf have closed and the level has been shut off. Presumably they went out of business or just quit when the crossrail opening didn't happen since they had zero passing trade. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|