Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 08:49:38 on Mon, 24 Jun
2019, Recliner remarked: Roland Perry wrote: Anyone going on the trips tomorrow? The Times report: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/m...e-to-the-past- n3fflhnjj?shareToken=ba4a2bbcd9ed7c9d0229bb423dde 68bd I'm curious why it didn't go on the original District line, through South Ken and on to Whitechapel? The route they did use was largely overground (indeed, on viaduct), and some near High St Ken was only covered long after the original opening. I'm sure it was a result of wanting to make as many trips per day as possible. According to the steward in our carriage, there's a 10mph speed limit approaching every station for this sort of train and the 2hr return trip diagram (to include boarding and detraining) was plenty long enough. A longer trip would also have interrupted the normal service too much (given the slow progress of the steam train). We brushed shoulders with all three of the character-actors in that photo, and there were a few more, including a Policeman, and of course the band. As for smoke-amd-smells, there was none, and one could be forgiven for thinking they weren't burning coal at all (they didn't say). Plenty of steam, and chuff-chuff noises, though. The only part that wasn't in daylight was from Earl Court station to outside South Ken. On the first half of the trip we stopped numerous times in that darkness. -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 08:49:38 on Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Recliner remarked: Roland Perry wrote: Anyone going on the trips tomorrow? The Times report: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/m...e-to-the-past- n3fflhnjj?shareToken=ba4a2bbcd9ed7c9d0229bb423dde6 8bd I'm curious why it didn't go on the original District line, through South Ken and on to Whitechapel? The route they did use was largely overground (indeed, on viaduct), and some near High St Ken was only covered long after the original opening. I'm sure it was a result of wanting to make as many trips per day as possible. According to the steward in our carriage, there's a 10mph speed limit approaching every station for this sort of train and the 2hr return trip diagram (to include boarding and detraining) was plenty long enough. A longer trip would also have interrupted the normal service too much (given the slow progress of the steam train). We brushed shoulders with all three of the character-actors in that photo, and there were a few more, including a Policeman, and of course the band. As for smoke-amd-smells, there was none, and one could be forgiven for thinking they weren't burning coal at all (they didn't say). Plenty of steam, and chuff-chuff noises, though. The only part that wasn't in daylight was from Earl Court station to outside South Ken. On the first half of the trip we stopped numerous times in that darkness. South Ken? Or High St Ken? During the steam era, that was all in the open (it was only built over in the 1950s, for the West London Air Terminal). That covered section past Triangle Sidings is very short indeed, so it seems unlikely you'd have stopped numerous times. You would also have gone through a different covered section between Earls Court and Barons Court, under the former exhibition hall. That too would have been open in the steam era, and for some decades thereafter (the exhibition hall was built over the tracks in 1935-7). So in steam days, that route would have been entirely in the open. And the sections that are covered now aren't real tunnels, just roofed-over former open sections. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:33:58 on Mon, 24 Jun
2019, Recliner remarked: Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 08:49:38 on Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Recliner remarked: Roland Perry wrote: Anyone going on the trips tomorrow? The Times report: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/m...e-to-the-past- n3fflhnjj?shareToken=ba4a2bbcd9ed7c9d0229bb423dde6 8bd I'm curious why it didn't go on the original District line, through South Ken and on to Whitechapel? The route they did use was largely overground (indeed, on viaduct), and some near High St Ken was only covered long after the original opening. I'm sure it was a result of wanting to make as many trips per day as possible. According to the steward in our carriage, there's a 10mph speed limit approaching every station for this sort of train and the 2hr return trip diagram (to include boarding and detraining) was plenty long enough. A longer trip would also have interrupted the normal service too much (given the slow progress of the steam train). We brushed shoulders with all three of the character-actors in that photo, and there were a few more, including a Policeman, and of course the band. As for smoke-amd-smells, there was none, and one could be forgiven for thinking they weren't burning coal at all (they didn't say). Plenty of steam, and chuff-chuff noises, though. The only part that wasn't in daylight was from Earl Court station to outside South Ken. On the first half of the trip we stopped numerous times in that darkness. South Ken? Or High St Ken? The latter. (Too many Kensingtons!) During the steam era, that was all in the open (it was only built over in the 1950s, for the West London Air Terminal). That covered section past Triangle Sidings is very short indeed, so it seems unlikely you'd have stopped numerous times. I have it on video. We stopped several times. You would also have gone through a different covered section between Earls Court and Barons Court, under the former exhibition hall. That too would have been open in the steam era, and for some decades thereafter (the exhibition hall was built over the tracks in 1935-7). So in steam days, that route would have been entirely in the open. And the sections that are covered now aren't real tunnels, just roofed-over former open sections. -- Roland Perry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:33:58 on Mon, 24 Jun
2019, Recliner remarked: The only part that wasn't in daylight was from Earl Court station to outside {High Street Ken}. During the steam era, that was all in the open (it was only built over in the 1950s, for the West London Air Terminal). When was Kelso Place built, that and the surrounding streets are above the line. Cutting out the stops, from Earls Court station about halfway along the platform we were moving under cover for 20sec, out in the open for 20sec, darkness again for 30sec, sidings for 30sec and then in darkness again (a proper tunnel!) for 1min 25sec. All timings to nearest 2sec. We weren't much above walking pace a lot of the time. You would also have gone through a different covered section between Earls Court and Barons Court, under the former exhibition hall. That too would have been open in the steam era, and for some decades thereafter (the exhibition hall was built over the tracks in 1935-7). I wasn't paying attention to the approach to Earls Court Station, but the line immediately west of the station is open-air and it ventilates the shed quite well. -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:33:58 on Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Recliner remarked: The only part that wasn't in daylight was from Earl Court station to outside {High Street Ken}. During the steam era, that was all in the open (it was only built over in the 1950s, for the West London Air Terminal). When was Kelso Place built, that and the surrounding streets are above the line. Apparently it was first mentioned in 1853, but the houses may be later. With those early cut and cover railways, they'd have had to demolish any houses along the line of the route, as with the famous Leinster Gardens and its fake houses. Some of the local roads might have existed, of course, with the line crossing under them. Cutting out the stops, from Earls Court station about halfway along the platform we were moving under cover for 20sec, out in the open for 20sec, darkness again for 30sec, sidings for 30sec and then in darkness again (a proper tunnel!) for 1min 25sec. Under Kelso Place? All timings to nearest 2sec. We weren't much above walking pace a lot of the time. You would also have gone through a different covered section between Earls Court and Barons Court, under the former exhibition hall. That too would have been open in the steam era, and for some decades thereafter (the exhibition hall was built over the tracks in 1935-7). I wasn't paying attention to the approach to Earls Court Station, but the line immediately west of the station is open-air and it ventilates the shed quite well. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Daily Telegraph: 150 fascinating Tube facts | London Transport | |||
Not-very dry run for 150-year anniversary Met steam | London Transport | |||
Has anyone received their tickets for the Tube 150 event? | London Transport | |||
District line, High St Kensington/Earls Court | London Transport | |||
District line, High St Kensington/Earls Court | London Transport |