Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
David Fairthorne wrote: wrote: ObTransport: the Rotherhithe tunnel -- narrow and windy? [...] It was be possible to cross the river on foot by the Rotherhithe tunnel by using the stairs on each side of the river. It was noisy, especially near sharp bends where tires scraped against the sidewalks. So I would say "narrow and winding". Do you remember whether the Rotherhithe tunnel had flowers growing above the entrance in the early 80s? It looks like it still is, in principle -- there are footpath-like (er) "footpaths" on either side of the roads through it. But I really wouldn't fancy trying to walk it, unless for some reason I felt myself particularly resistant to exhaust fumes. The trouble is it's not windy enough to get rid of those exhaust fumes! And I agree "winding" is better than "windy"; the difference between "windy" (winding) and "windy" (breezy) is clear when spoken, but non-existant when written. The solution is to spell it "windey". If enough people do, the dictionaries will follow... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The BorisBike flow asymmetry problem solved | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport | |||
Tackling the problems of London's transport system | London Transport | |||
Oyster - the online-bought top-up problem solved | London Transport | |||
And you thought it was just London that had problems ... | London Transport |