London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 04, 08:34 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2004
Posts: 92
Default LUL track gauge not the same as BR gauge?


"Nigel " wrote in message
...

There are regional variations in the UK albeit by only a tiny margin.

The Liverpool & Manchester 4' 8"
The London Tube 4' 8 3/8"
Uk Standard Guage 4' 8 1/2" (4' 8 " on tight curves)

and (I think) the Glasgopw Underground was 4' 7"


The Glasgow subway was 4ft, until modernisation when it was widened.

By 1mm. :-)




  #12   Report Post  
Old September 3rd 04, 08:37 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 38
Default LUL track gauge not the same as BR gauge?

Official track gauge is normally specified in mm. As I recall, the BR
track gauge was actually changed a few years ago by a few mm.


Do you actually know when or where I could find out?

Burkey


  #13   Report Post  
Old September 4th 04, 05:15 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2003
Posts: 351
Default LUL track gauge not the same as BR gauge?

In article , Bob Adams wrote:
In message , Nick Leverton
writes

The issue I read of, I don't know how far true though, was that the
Standard stock's hardened steel tyres wore the rails down excessivly
fast when they first went to the IoW.


I believe the wear increased exponentially at over 70 mph.
;-)


That's fast ;-)

Nick
--
"And we will be restoring neurotypicality just as soon as we are sure
what is normal anyway. Thank you". -- not quite DNA
  #14   Report Post  
Old September 6th 04, 04:54 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default LUL track gauge not the same as BR gauge?

In article , James
writes
If stock
which has wheels ¼" further apart tries to run on such rails, there
are likely to be no problems, although they may end up riding on the
wheel-flanges.


Riding on the flanges would not be a good thing. They aren't coned, so
the self-steering property of a wheelset wouldn't be there. And since
the flanges aren't in the right place to act as a last resort, you'd
derail within a few metres.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Track Charts or Track maps of the London Underground [email protected] London Transport 5 December 16th 06 01:30 AM
DLR track gauge Boltar London Transport 64 August 14th 06 12:22 PM
Christmas Won`t Be The Same Again!!! Robert McCall London Transport 20 December 16th 04 04:34 PM
More expensive for same journey? Marcus Fox London Transport 20 August 28th 04 11:18 PM
Unions to decide safety inspections on LUL track? JDikseun London Transport 3 December 6th 03 03:55 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017