Oyster, pre-pay.
 

If you touch in, but then don't touch out, what is the charging scheme?
Are you charged the maximum for the route you're on, or the minimum or
what?
--
Clive.

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

If you touch in, but then don't touch out, what is the charging scheme?
Are you charged the maximum for the route you're on, or the minimum or
what?

When the system was introduced you were only being charged a minimum fare
and that was still the case as late as August. However it seems it has
always been the plan to switch to charging the maximum possible fare. I
don't know if that has now been brought in.

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

In message , Huge
writes
If you touch in, but then don't touch out, what is the charging scheme?
Are you charged the maximum for the route you're on, or the minimum or
what?

What do you think? This is PT we're talking about here.
If I knew I wouldn't be asking. It's just that someone had the tag
line "Always touch in and touch out" but the other day I went through
the gates at Clapham Junction and the gates were open and people were
just being herded through by the staff without the chance to stop and
touch out, hence my question. Or perhaps you just don't know the
answer.
--
Clive.

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

If I knew I wouldn't be asking. It's just that someone had the tag
line "Always touch in and touch out" but the other day I went through
the gates at Clapham Junction and the gates were open and people were
just being herded through by the staff without the chance to stop and
touch out, hence my question.

As far as I am aware, Pre-Pay isn't valid on any national rail services
using Clapham Junction so there wouldn't be an issue there.

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

"Huge" wrote in message
...
Clive Coleman writes:
In message , Huge
writes
If you touch in, but then don't touch out, what is the charging scheme?
Are you charged the maximum for the route you're on, or the minimum or
what?

What do you think? This is PT we're talking about here.
If I knew I wouldn't be asking. It's just that someone had the tag
line "Always touch in and touch out" but the other day I went through
the gates at Clapham Junction and the gates were open and people were
just being herded through by the staff without the chance to stop and
touch out, hence my question. Or perhaps you just don't know the
answer.

Oh, I don't. I wouldn't carry an Oyster since I have no wish to report
my movements to Ken Livingstone.

Unregistered prepay, pass it arround. Of course when they break (frequently)
they steal the value left on the card off you.


But since the point of PT is to rip people off, it's obvious which way
round it is.

You are correct, it's (almost) the highest charge - a Z1-6 single. Cheaper
then a Z1-D single, so dont touch out at Amersham!

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

On 3 Dec 2004 12:35:51 GMT, (Huge) wrote:

Clive Coleman writes:
In message , Huge
writes
If you touch in, but then don't touch out, what is the charging scheme?
Are you charged the maximum for the route you're on, or the minimum or
what?

What do you think? This is PT we're talking about here.
If I knew I wouldn't be asking. It's just that someone had the tag
line "Always touch in and touch out" but the other day I went through
the gates at Clapham Junction and the gates were open and people were
just being herded through by the staff without the chance to stop and
touch out, hence my question. Or perhaps you just don't know the
answer.

Oh, I don't. I wouldn't carry an Oyster since I have no wish to report
my movements to Ken Livingstone.

My, how paranoid are you?

But since the point of PT is to rip people off, it's obvious which way
round it is.

Obvious that you're talking ********.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War:
http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm
625-Online - classic British television:
http://www.625.org.uk
'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic:
http://www.thingstocome.org.uk

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

On 4 Dec 2004 18:23:23 GMT, (Huge) wrote:

(Nick Cooper) writes:
On 3 Dec 2004 12:35:51 GMT, (Huge) wrote:

[16 lines snipped]

Oh, I don't. I wouldn't carry an Oyster since I have no wish to report
my movements to Ken Livingstone.

My, how paranoid are you?

What's it to you?

But since the point of PT is to rip people off, it's obvious which way
round it is.

Obvious that you're talking ********.

Obvious that you haven't the vaguest idea what you're on about.

--
1 Nick Cooper
2
3 [Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]
4
5 The London Underground at War:
6 http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm
7 625-Online - classic British television:
8 http://www.625.org.uk
9 'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic:
10 http://www.thingstocome.org.uk

Your sig is too long.

And clearly your cock (literal or metaphorical) is too small.

WHOIS query result:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Domain Name:
huge.org.uk

Registrant:
Piglet's Pickles and Preserves

Registrant's Address:

THE REGISTRANT IS AN INDIVIDUAL WHO HAS ELECTED TO
HAVE THEIR ADDRESS OMITTED FROM THE WHOIS DATABASE

The opinion of anonymous cowards means nothing.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War:
http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm
625-Online - classic British television:
http://www.625.org.uk
'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic:
http://www.thingstocome.org.uk

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

"Nick Cooper" wrote in
message ...
And clearly your cock (literal or metaphorical) is too small.

Ever heard of snipping. I nearly lost this hugely (no pun intended) relecent
point in all the quoted stuff.
--
Everything above is the personal opinion of the author, and nothing to do
with where he works and all that lovely disclaimery stuff.
Posted in his lunch hour too.

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 11:54:46 -0000, "Paul Weaver"
wrote:

"Nick Cooper" wrote in
message ...
And clearly your cock (literal or metaphorical) is too small.

Ever heard of snipping. I nearly lost this hugely (no pun intended) relecent
point in all the quoted stuff.

Sometime it is necessary to leave everything to demonstrate the idiocy
of the person one is replying to.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War:
http://www.cwgcuser.org.uk/personal/...ra/lu/tuaw.htm
625-Online - classic British television:
http://www.625.org.uk
'Things to Come' - An Incomplete Classic:
http://www.thingstocome.org.uk

Oyster, pre-pay.
 

"Graham J" wrote in message
...
If you touch in, but then don't touch out, what is the charging scheme?
Are you charged the maximum for the route you're on, or the minimum or
what?

When the system was introduced you were only being charged a minimum fare
and that was still the case as late as August. However it seems it has
always been the plan to switch to charging the maximum possible fare. I
don't know if that has now been brought in.


Yesterday I was unable to "touch out" my prepay Oyster due to all the gates
being out of order at a station that I was exiting from.

When I phoned the Oystercard helpline, I was told that I was only charged
the minimum fare for that journey. When I asked if and when the max fare
might be introduced for this sort of thing, they said "soon".