London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 6th 04, 09:34 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 106
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

LUL signal and control staff to ballot after talks fail - 6 Dec 2004

DECEMBER 6: LONDON UNDERGROUND's biggest union is to ballot more than 330
signallers and line controllers for strike action after six months of
negotiations failed to resolve a four-year dispute over pay rates, pay
structures, hours and conditions.


Press release from the RMT today:

A year after RMT won a £2,000 interim payment for signalling and
service-control grades, and six months after a working party began detailed
talks, LUL has demanded 14 per cent reduction in jobs, lengthening of
shifts, reduction in minimum rest-periods and other "unacceptable" strings.

"These talks were supposed to be about improving conditions, not worsening
them," said RMT general secretary Bob Crow today.

"Signalling and control staff have now been waiting for four years to see
pay parity with drivers restored, a 35-hour week and other long-standing
problems resolved.

"After six months of talks we were told that the price of restructuring is
76 jobs, the lengthening of shifts and a host of other strings that are
frankly unacceptable.

"LUL might see this as flexibility, but for our members it adds up to a huge
step backwards, and the RMT executive has today authorised a ballot for
strike action," Bob Crow said.

"Twelve hours is simply too long for anyone to be in charge of a signal box
or control panel, but that is what the company wants," said assistant
general secretary Pat Sikorski.

"Safety critical staff need sufficient guaranteed rest time between shifts,
but LUL also wants to cut minimum rest time from 12 to 11 hours and to vary
shift start times by up to four hours at short notice.

"When it came to pay we were happy to negotiate a unified and simplified pay
scale, but by 'red-circling' individuals outside the new structure the
company is attempting to use it as a downgrading exercise," Pat Sikorski
said.

ends


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 6th 04, 11:37 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2004
Posts: 8
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

In article ,
Malcolm & Nika wrote:
Press release from the RMT today:

Christmas is approaching fast, and we're way behind on the shopping. We
need to ensure that our members can get it all done in one day without the
shops being too overcrowded.


Dave
--
Email: MSN Messenger:
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 08:12 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 106
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

You are a silly billy Dave.

"David Marshall" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Malcolm & Nika wrote:
Press release from the RMT today:

Christmas is approaching fast, and we're way behind on the shopping. We
need to ensure that our members can get it all done in one day without the
shops being too overcrowded.


Dave
--
Email: MSN Messenger:



  #4   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 09:00 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

Malcolm & Nika wrote:
LUL signal and control staff to ballot after talks fail - 6 Dec 2004

DECEMBER 6: LONDON UNDERGROUND's biggest union is to ballot more than

330
signallers and line controllers for strike action after six months of


negotiations failed to resolve a four-year dispute over pay rates,

pay
structures, hours and conditions.


Oh what a surprise , its almost christmas and theres a possible strike
on
the underground.

Given the amount of strikes on the underground recently this leads
to 2 conclusions:

A) LU is one of the worst blue collar employers in the country and the
staff
are living a wretched existense despite the high pay rates and easy
hours or

B) The people who work for it are some of the most greedy, work shy,
selfish
and bone idle ******* in britain who are about as much in touch with
workplace
reality as Timothy Leary on a bad trip.
So lets have a survey. Why is it all you LU people? A or B?

B2003

  #5   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 09:01 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.


Malcolm & Nika wrote:
LUL signal and control staff to ballot after talks fail - 6 Dec 2004

DECEMBER 6: LONDON UNDERGROUND's biggest union is to ballot more than

330
signallers and line controllers for strike action after six months of


negotiations failed to resolve a four-year dispute over pay rates,

pay
structures, hours and conditions.


Oh what a surprise , its almost christmas and theres a possible strike
on
the underground.

Given the amount of strikes on the underground recently this leads
to 2 conclusions:

A) LU is one of the worst blue collar employers in the country and the
staff
are living a wretched existense despite the high pay rates and easy
hours or

B) The people who work for it are some of the most greedy, work shy,
selfish
and bone idle ******* in britain who are about as much in touch with
workplace
reality as Timothy Leary on a bad trip.
So lets have a survey. Why is it all you LU people? A or B?

B2003



  #6   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 05:55 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 106
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

Oh dear poor Boltar...you have a stutter.

Actually its neither of those. Life isnt quite so simple as an A or B
response.
I think the press release puts it quite succinctly.
Plainly the signallers and control centre people see it one way and LU see
it another. I am sure some discussion will see it all blow over and it will
all be a big misunderstanding.
Perhaps the LU management and staff are much more in touch with good
industrial relations and negotiation than you think.

Cant wait for your response.......


"Boltar" wrote in message
oups.com...

Malcolm & Nika wrote:
LUL signal and control staff to ballot after talks fail - 6 Dec 2004

DECEMBER 6: LONDON UNDERGROUND's biggest union is to ballot more than

330
signallers and line controllers for strike action after six months of


negotiations failed to resolve a four-year dispute over pay rates,

pay
structures, hours and conditions.


Oh what a surprise , its almost christmas and theres a possible strike
on
the underground.

Given the amount of strikes on the underground recently this leads
to 2 conclusions:

A) LU is one of the worst blue collar employers in the country and the
staff
are living a wretched existense despite the high pay rates and easy
hours or

B) The people who work for it are some of the most greedy, work shy,
selfish
and bone idle ******* in britain who are about as much in touch with
workplace
reality as Timothy Leary on a bad trip.
So lets have a survey. Why is it all you LU people? A or B?

B2003



  #7   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 06:35 PM posted to uk.transport.london
d d is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2004
Posts: 187
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

How about they try good ol' diplomacy? Instead, they act selfishly, and
screw over the public. Repeatedly. Am I the only person who finds this
disgusting?

I'm all for unions. I've seen how they can get workers the rewards they
deserve. I've also seen how they get greedy and take more. I'd hate to
think the RMT is the second type, but with more and more industrial action
threats flying about, it's getting harder to think otherwise.

d.

"Malcolm & Nika" wrote in message
...
Oh dear poor Boltar...you have a stutter.

Actually its neither of those. Life isnt quite so simple as an A or B
response.
I think the press release puts it quite succinctly.
Plainly the signallers and control centre people see it one way and LU see
it another. I am sure some discussion will see it all blow over and it
will all be a big misunderstanding.
Perhaps the LU management and staff are much more in touch with good
industrial relations and negotiation than you think.

Cant wait for your response.......


"Boltar" wrote in message
oups.com...

Malcolm & Nika wrote:
LUL signal and control staff to ballot after talks fail - 6 Dec 2004

DECEMBER 6: LONDON UNDERGROUND's biggest union is to ballot more than

330
signallers and line controllers for strike action after six months of


negotiations failed to resolve a four-year dispute over pay rates,

pay
structures, hours and conditions.


Oh what a surprise , its almost christmas and theres a possible strike
on
the underground.

Given the amount of strikes on the underground recently this leads
to 2 conclusions:

A) LU is one of the worst blue collar employers in the country and the
staff
are living a wretched existense despite the high pay rates and easy
hours or

B) The people who work for it are some of the most greedy, work shy,
selfish
and bone idle ******* in britain who are about as much in touch with
workplace
reality as Timothy Leary on a bad trip.
So lets have a survey. Why is it all you LU people? A or B?

B2003





  #8   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 07:10 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 106
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong but it says: "after six months of
negotiations failed to resolve a four-year dispute"....

Like you, I am not involved in the nitty gritty, but if thats true how much
diplomacy is the right amount?


"d" wrote in message
. uk...
How about they try good ol' diplomacy? Instead, they act selfishly, and
screw over the public. Repeatedly. Am I the only person who finds this
disgusting?

I'm all for unions. I've seen how they can get workers the rewards they
deserve. I've also seen how they get greedy and take more. I'd hate to
think the RMT is the second type, but with more and more industrial action
threats flying about, it's getting harder to think otherwise.

d.



  #9   Report Post  
Old December 7th 04, 08:19 PM posted to uk.transport.london
d d is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2004
Posts: 187
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

Judging by the amount of industrial action by this union compared to other
unions, it makes you wonder...

I'm just saying it doesn't look good to people. The same people who have to
endure the strikes.

"Malcolm & Nika" wrote in message
...
I'm not saying anyone is right or wrong but it says: "after six months of
negotiations failed to resolve a four-year dispute"....

Like you, I am not involved in the nitty gritty, but if thats true how
much diplomacy is the right amount?


"d" wrote in message
. uk...
How about they try good ol' diplomacy? Instead, they act selfishly, and
screw over the public. Repeatedly. Am I the only person who finds this
disgusting?

I'm all for unions. I've seen how they can get workers the rewards they
deserve. I've also seen how they get greedy and take more. I'd hate to
think the RMT is the second type, but with more and more industrial
action threats flying about, it's getting harder to think otherwise.

d.





  #10   Report Post  
Old December 8th 04, 08:38 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default Oh dear.....I'm sure it wont happen.

Actually its neither of those. Life isnt quite so simple as an A or B
response.


Oh I think it is in this case. The RMT have seen an opportunity to
screw LU because its xmas time and
they know it'll be bad public relations to have a strike then.

it another. I am sure some discussion will see it all blow over and it

will
all be a big misunderstanding.


What , like all the others? Dream on.

Perhaps the LU management and staff are much more in touch with good
industrial relations and negotiation than you think.


LU management might be , but the RMT woudln't know good industrial
relations
if it was served up on a plate in front of them with a large
explanatory notice written
in crayon.

B2003



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
They said it would never happen... Paul Scott London Transport 3 November 20th 09 01:04 PM
Why would this happen? Boltar London Transport 4 December 5th 07 10:56 AM
Oh dear - commuter services out of Euston today, poor incident planning and the BTP Neil Williams London Transport 55 July 17th 07 06:45 AM
Dear, Colin*^*^*^ Net Goog Share Worth Calulated *^*^*^ Adsense-Support London Transport 0 March 22nd 07 10:17 PM
What will happen to KX Thameslink? Heliomass London Transport 46 April 13th 04 11:38 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017