Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
Colin Rosenstiel wrote: The perch seats are unusable by people of normal height. I second that for the Piccadilly line. The only vaguely usable ones are the car-end ones, but they're still not particularly comfortable. Standing is far more comfortable than "perching". Only for people who have two good legs and/or are not pregnant etc. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brimstone wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: The perch seats are unusable by people of normal height. I second that for the Piccadilly line. The only vaguely usable ones are the car-end ones, but they're still not particularly comfortable. Standing is far more comfortable than "perching". Only for people who have two good legs and/or are not pregnant etc. Fair enough. Of course, for those people, an actual seat is probably far superior, be it tip-up or not. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article . com, () wrote: Boltar wrote: Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. IMO flip up seats are more expensive than normal fixed seats - they move and hence need more maintenance, they require more spares to be kept vs. having all fixed seats, and they require more space - you can't house equipment under them. A cheaper option would be perch seats, which one leans against. The Jubilee 1996 stock has these in place of the Northern 1995's flip ups, which often seem to have broken springs and don't return to upright. The perch seats are unusable by people of normal height. I'm taller than average, which is probably why I'd prefer a perch seat to standing. -- Michael Hoffman |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , lid
(Michael Hoffman) wrote: Colin Rosenstiel wrote: In article . com, () wrote: Boltar wrote: Call me a cynic but I can't help thinking that flip up seats are probably a lot cheaper than the real thing though I'm sure this in no way would influence their decision , no no, not at all. IMO flip up seats are more expensive than normal fixed seats - they move and hence need more maintenance, they require more spares to be kept vs. having all fixed seats, and they require more space - you can't house equipment under them. A cheaper option would be perch seats, which one leans against. The Jubilee 1996 stock has these in place of the Northern 1995's flip ups, which often seem to have broken springs and don't return to upright. The perch seats are unusable by people of normal height. I'm taller than average, which is probably why I'd prefer a perch seat to standing. Our experiences are different then. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pa on new victoria line trains | London Transport | |||
Seats on London Overground and the new Victoria Line trains | London Transport | |||
New victoria line trains | London Transport | |||
New Victoria Line Trains | London Transport | |||
More details on new victoria line trains...... | London Transport |