Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Integrating river services
Dave Arquati wrote:
Aidan Stanger wrote: Yet they're eager to spend far more on infrastructure projects like the £40m bus lane on the Thames Gateway Bridge, and the Canary Wharf branch of Crossrail, which would cost far more than subsidies for boats ever would. The cost of running boats is on the high side, but so are the benefits: they can quickly provide plenty of capacity, link communities N and S of the river, and serve remote parts of London which do not have bus services (parts of Thamesmead are more than 500m from buses, and some riverside industrial estates are much further). Can you get from Heathrow to Canary Wharf by boat? Or from most parts of West London, Paddington, the West End etc? It's not really relevant to compare boat subsidies to the cost of Crossrail It is really relevant to compare them to the cost of THE CANARY WHARF BRANCH OF Crossrail, as its function would be very similar: providing capacity to Canary Wharf, and linking communities across the river. The Canary Wharf branch of Crossrail would only save about ten minutes on the journey from Heathrow, or W.London, Paddington etc. to Canary Wharf, compared with Crossrail to Stratford and then a short DLR journey. I'm not saying such a branch should never be built, but it should be a lower priority than Crossrail Line 2. Meanwhile, boats can provide the connectivity at a sensible cost. - or even the Thames Gateway Bridge for that matter (where did you get the £40m figure from?). TfL expect the entire project to cost £400m, and the bus lanes were expected to come to 10% of the cost. Actually they did say "up to 10%" to it could be less, though somehow I doubt it. Anyway, it would be an appalling waste of money, as tolls would ensure that traffic on the bridge would be free flowing anyway. Boats won't take you from Thamesmead to Romford, or Abbey Wood to Barking. Buses would do that without bus lanes. Boats can be useful but the river serves a limited catchment area; interchange is also difficult between river and other modes except at a few choice locations (although I accept that that can be remedied). Many locations upstream of Greenwich, and a few town centers downstream! The problem with the river is that any pier will by its nature only have half the catchment area of an inland rail/Tube station. But development density is high enough for that not to be a problem. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
River services - at a rate of knots | London Transport | |||
Travelcard discounts on river services | London Transport | |||
River Services | London Transport | |||
River Transport Services - a couple of observations | London Transport | |||
Cross River Transit 2? | London Transport |