Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Boltar wrote: Presumably since its only 1 tram it'll be identical to the trams currently on the network? If it's being combined with the Liverpool order, I would say probably not - the order will have to be put out to tender in the OJEC, and AIUI the most they could specify is compatibility with the current fleet. That's why Strasbourg couldn't just order more Eurotrams from Bombardier - and in fact ended up ordering compatible (and visually similar) Citadis from Alstom. All rather confusing, really. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Rupert Candy wrote: Boltar wrote: Presumably since its only 1 tram it'll be identical to the trams currently on the network? If it's being combined with the Liverpool order, I would say probably not - the order will have to be put out to tender in the OJEC, and AIUI the most they could specify is compatibility with the current fleet. That's why Strasbourg couldn't just order more Eurotrams from Bombardier - and in fact ended up ordering compatible (and visually similar) Citadis from Alstom. All rather confusing, really. But whats the benefit in having one tram that may require different maintenance and/or operating procedures to every other tram on the system? B2003 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Apr 2005, Boltar wrote:
Rupert Candy wrote: Boltar wrote: Presumably since its only 1 tram it'll be identical to the trams currently on the network? If it's being combined with the Liverpool order, I would say probably not - the order will have to be put out to tender in the OJEC, and AIUI the most they could specify is compatibility with the current fleet. That's why Strasbourg couldn't just order more Eurotrams from Bombardier - and in fact ended up ordering compatible (and visually similar) Citadis from Alstom. All rather confusing, really. But whats the benefit in having one tram that may require different maintenance and/or operating procedures to every other tram on the system? The tram itself might be cheaper. Basically, if (capital saving) / (lifetime of tram) is more than (additional annual operation cost), it's a net win. If you can design a tram so that (additional annual operational cost) is modest - say by using the same or similar control layout and operating procedures - and manufacture it more cheaply than your rivals, you're onto a winner. It's called the free market. Mind you, it's never actually been seen to work in practice, but that's another story. tom -- The ``is'' keyword binds with the same precedence as ``.'', even when it's not actually there. -- Larry Wall, Apocalypse 2 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Joined up thinking? Not at LU. | London Transport | |||
A good day for burying good news - ELL Phase 2 | London Transport | |||
Thinking of your next holiday | London Transport | |||
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? | London Transport |