Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Flying terminus was Connectivity
What the hell is a flying terminus? I'm getting visions of some
sort of Hayao Miyazaki sort of affair ... http://216.55.161.203/theonekea/unde...g-terminus.txt The person who invented this Huh? Grade-separating the scissors crossover is hardly a huge leap of the imagination. I'm sure a lot more than 1 person has thought of it before, and then only considered it a passing thought rather than an invention! has done the math and discovered that reversing capacity on this terminal layout is very high - capacity is only limited by the run in time + dwell time + run out time; if these values are kept low, frequencies as high as 40tph can be contemplated. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Flying terminus was Connectivity
asdf wrote:
Huh? Grade-separating the scissors crossover is hardly a huge leap of the imagination. I'm sure a lot more than 1 person has thought of it before, and then only considered it a passing thought rather than an invention! So? That doesn't change the fact that with almost all of the conflicting movements created by a flat terminal layout removed by grade-separating the scissors crossover, line capacity can be massively increased. If it's so humdrum, why hasn't it been done yet? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Flying terminus was Connectivity
On 21 May 2005 07:35:38 -0700, "TheOneKEA"
wrote: asdf wrote: Huh? Grade-separating the scissors crossover is hardly a huge leap of the imagination. I'm sure a lot more than 1 person has thought of it before, and then only considered it a passing thought rather than an invention! So? That doesn't change the fact that with almost all of the conflicting movements created by a flat terminal layout removed by grade-separating the scissors crossover, line capacity can be massively increased. If it's so humdrum, why hasn't it been done yet? The idea may be trivial, but finding the will and the funding to actually do it most certainly isn't! Especially considering it would only really be necessary from (year when new Vic stock is introduced) until (year when Crossrail 2 opens) - projected at 7 years, though no doubt it will be nearer 20 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|