wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

We all know what hypocrites new labour are but did anybody else
see Blair and Prestcott getting in a Range Rover yesterday on tv

I'll go and trade my 1.6 litre in for a gas guzzling 4.5 litre
4x4. If its ok by Tony and John then it must be ok.

Did they choose the vehicle they were going to travel in or was it
simply provided for them?

I'm wondering if a Ford Focus armoured to the protection levels that
Rangie would be may actually be able to move under it's own
power...?

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied to isn't
mine.

Brimstone wrote:
wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

We all know what hypocrites new labour are but did anybody
else see Blair and Prestcott getting in a Range Rover
yesterday on tv

I'll go and trade my 1.6 litre in for a gas guzzling 4.5 litre
4x4. If its ok by Tony and John then it must be ok.

Did they choose the vehicle they were going to travel in or was
it simply provided for them?

I'm wondering if a Ford Focus armoured to the protection levels
that Rangie would be may actually be able to move under it's own
power...?

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied to
isn't mine.

The last comment he replied to, i.e. the one with one in front of it
in his mail, was "Given the difficulty ..."

Are you saying that you didn't post that at 27/5/05 at 18:04?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Richard J. wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding much
like they were saying :

We all know what hypocrites new labour are but did anybody
else see Blair and Prestcott getting in a Range Rover
yesterday on tv

I'll go and trade my 1.6 litre in for a gas guzzling 4.5 litre
4x4. If its ok by Tony and John then it must be ok.

Did they choose the vehicle they were going to travel in or was
it simply provided for them?

I'm wondering if a Ford Focus armoured to the protection levels
that Rangie would be may actually be able to move under it's own
power...?

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied to
isn't mine.

The last comment he replied to, i.e. the one with one in front of it
in his mail, was "Given the difficulty ..."

Are you saying that you didn't post that at 27/5/05 at 18:04?

What's it got to do with you?

Brimstone wrote:
Richard J. wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying :

We all know what hypocrites new labour are but did anybody
else see Blair and Prestcott getting in a Range Rover
yesterday on tv

I'll go and trade my 1.6 litre in for a gas guzzling 4.5
litre 4x4. If its ok by Tony and John then it must be ok.

Did they choose the vehicle they were going to travel in or
was it simply provided for them?

I'm wondering if a Ford Focus armoured to the protection levels
that Rangie would be may actually be able to move under it's
own power...?

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied
to isn't mine.

The last comment he replied to, i.e. the one with one in front
of it in his mail, was "Given the difficulty ..."

Are you saying that you didn't post that at 27/5/05 at 18:04?

What's it got to do with you?

Er, this is a public newsgroup, not private e-mail.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Richard J. wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Richard J. wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying :

We all know what hypocrites new labour are but did anybody
else see Blair and Prestcott getting in a Range Rover
yesterday on tv

I'll go and trade my 1.6 litre in for a gas guzzling 4.5
litre 4x4. If its ok by Tony and John then it must be ok.

Did they choose the vehicle they were going to travel in or
was it simply provided for them?

I'm wondering if a Ford Focus armoured to the protection levels
that Rangie would be may actually be able to move under it's
own power...?

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied
to isn't mine.

The last comment he replied to, i.e. the one with one in front
of it in his mail, was "Given the difficulty ..."

Are you saying that you didn't post that at 27/5/05 at 18:04?

What's it got to do with you?

Er, this is a public newsgroup, not private e-mail.

Congratulations on your perception. Now answer the question.

Brimstone wrote:
Richard J. wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Richard J. wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
Adrian wrote:
Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying :

We all know what hypocrites new labour are but did
anybody else see Blair and Prestcott getting in a Range
Rover yesterday on tv

I'll go and trade my 1.6 litre in for a gas guzzling 4.5
litre 4x4. If its ok by Tony and John then it must be ok.

Did they choose the vehicle they were going to travel in or
was it simply provided for them?

I'm wondering if a Ford Focus armoured to the protection
levels that Rangie would be may actually be able to move
under it's own power...?

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied
to isn't mine.

The last comment he replied to, i.e. the one with one in front
of it in his mail, was "Given the difficulty ..."

Are you saying that you didn't post that at 27/5/05 at 18:04?

What's it got to do with you?

Er, this is a public newsgroup, not private e-mail.

Congratulations on your perception. Now answer the question.

The question of what it's got to do with me? Well, as this is a public
newsgroup to which I subscribe, I am naturally concerned if anyone is
thought to be impersonating a regular contributor, which was one
possible interpretation of your post of 3 June 13:59. Of course it
might have been just a simple error on your part, in which case a simple
apology would suffice, don't you think?

As far as I am concerned, everything in this NG is to do with me. I am
not aware of any rules or conventions that prevent me joining in a
discussion. Have a nice weekend.
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)

Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied to isn't
mine.

If it isn't, you're being very convincingly frogged.
Message-ID:

Adrian wrote:
Brimstone ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

Given the difficulty they have with their designed weight ....

Prescott or Blair?

Please be careful when snipping. The last comment you've replied to
isn't mine.

If it isn't, you're being very convincingly frogged.
Message-ID:

Having re-read the thread and put the brain back in gear I've realised the
post was mine. Apologies to alexterrell.

..... and I still don't know whether Blair or Prescott has difficulty
with their designed weight!

wrote:
.... and I still don't know whether Blair or Prescott has difficulty
with their designed weight!

The answer might well be, "Yes".