Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roger H. Bennett" writes:
[29 lines snipped] Once again Thameslink has been quite successful Only if "successful" includes being the least reliable TOC in the country, according to the SRA. -- "The road to Paradise is through Intercourse." The uk.transport FAQ; http://www.huge.org.uk/transport/FAQ.html [email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk] |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Huge wrote:
Only if "successful" includes being the least reliable TOC in the country, according to the SRA. Figures which were, in my opinion, intollerably deceptive. There's a big difference between a TOC that can deliver one train an hour with every train on time and one that delivers eight trains an hour with every train five minutes late. Dave -- Email: MSN Messenger: |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 20 Jul 2003 08:56:27 GMT Huge wrote:
} (David Marshall) writes: } In article , Huge wrote: } Only if "successful" includes being the least reliable TOC in the } country, according to the SRA. } } Figures which were, in my opinion, intollerably deceptive. } } Indeed. What they should have said is that Thameslink's management will } be publically hanged in front of St. Pancras station. In front of Kings Cross if you please. Less aestheticaly damaging. Matthew -- Il est important d'être un homme ou une femme en colère; le jour où nous quitte la colère, ou le désir, c'est cuit. - Barbara http://www.calmeilles.co.uk/ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matthew Malthouse writes:
On 20 Jul 2003 08:56:27 GMT Huge wrote: } (David Marshall) writes: } In article , Huge wrote: } Only if "successful" includes being the least reliable TOC in the } country, according to the SRA. } } Figures which were, in my opinion, intollerably deceptive. } } Indeed. What they should have said is that Thameslink's management will } be publically hanged in front of St. Pancras station. In front of Kings Cross if you please. Less aestheticaly damaging. Oh, I don't know. I would have thought that gibbets fit in quite well with Victorian Gothic. -- "The road to Paradise is through Intercourse." The uk.transport FAQ; http://www.huge.org.uk/transport/FAQ.html [email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk] |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Huge wrote:
Thameslink publish the timetable. It's entirely their fault if they can't abide by it. Absolutely. But with such a frequent service it doesn't really *matter*. Dave -- Email: MSN Messenger: |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:38:57 +0000 (UTC), (David
Marshall) wrote: In article , Huge wrote: Thameslink publish the timetable. It's entirely their fault if they can't abide by it. Absolutely. But with such a frequent service it doesn't really *matter*. From my expirience, the frequent service only "doesn't matter" on paper. In the real world, Thameslink seem to develop huge gaps in the service on an alarmingly regular basis. Also, with the MML sharing with them, 5 minutes can miss a path, which causes it to wait for the next one, which makes the delay longer, which makes the already bad congestion on the service even worse. --- This message has come to an end. Please exit to your left. *UK Dark Ride and UK Theme Park Trip Reports* http://www.lewstube.fsnet.co.uk Remove my clothing to reply. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lew 1 (from the UK)" writes:
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:38:57 +0000 (UTC), (David Marshall) wrote: In article , Huge wrote: Thameslink publish the timetable. It's entirely their fault if they can't abide by it. Absolutely. But with such a frequent service it doesn't really *matter*. From my expirience, the frequent service only "doesn't matter" on paper. In the real world, Thameslink seem to develop huge gaps in the service on an alarmingly regular basis Quite. Especially with bull**** like only 2 trains an hour northbound from London Bridge in the evening rush, and those "all stations". -- "The road to Paradise is through Intercourse." The uk.transport FAQ; http://www.huge.org.uk/transport/FAQ.html [email me at huge [at] huge [dot] org [dot] uk] |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Huge" wrote in message ... "Lew 1 (from the UK)" writes: On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:38:57 +0000 (UTC), (David Marshall) wrote: In article , Huge wrote: Thameslink publish the timetable. It's entirely their fault if they can't abide by it. Absolutely. But with such a frequent service it doesn't really *matter*. From my expirience, the frequent service only "doesn't matter" on paper. In the real world, Thameslink seem to develop huge gaps in the service on an alarmingly regular basis Quite. Especially with bull**** like only 2 trains an hour northbound from London Bridge in the evening rush, and those "all stations". It is not really Thameslink's fault that there are not enough paths available through London Bridge in the rush hour. Peter Smyth |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |