Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] The Duffield Sluice
Evening all,
While we're on the subject of mysterious old infrastructure-related plaques on the sides of buildings: http://urchin.earth.li/~twic/Duffield_Sluice.jpg Any takers on what the Duffield Sluice is (or was)? Something to do with the Surrey and Kent sewers, i suppose, but i wonder if anyone has any more detailed ideas. This sign is on a house near to the Thames in Bermondsey, facing the Old Justice pub, roundabout he http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?q=SE16...005,0.02&hl=en tom -- When I see a man on a bicycle I have hope for the human race. -- H. G. Wells |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] The Duffield Sluice
In message , Tom
Anderson writes While we're on the subject of mysterious old infrastructure-related plaques on the sides of buildings: http://urchin.earth.li/~twic/Duffield_Sluice.jpg Any takers on what the Duffield Sluice is (or was)? Something to do with the Surrey and Kent sewers, i suppose, but i wonder if anyone has any more detailed ideas. Almost certainly it was originally a sluice gate for one of the many tidal mills in Bermondsey. Ditches would channel the incoming Thames tide into mill ponds and the sluice gate would be shut to trap the water. During working hours, providing there was an outgoing tide, the gate would be opened to allow the water back into the river, powering various mills as it went. From the description, it looks to be close to the point where the small ditch enters the Thames, bottom right of the following: http://users.bathspa.ac.uk/greenwood...8h.html#bottom You can see "Mill Pond Street" close by, and if you click down (and right) to the adjacent map segments, you can see the various large mill ponds. Many of these ditches (and the branches of the nearby Neckinger river) were used as open sewers by the early 19th century. I don't know who Duffield was - probably a local mill owner, but possibly the John Duffied who built a pump room and spa at the head of the Fleet, on Hampstead Heath, in 1701. -- Paul Terry |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] The Duffield Sluice
"Paul Terry" wrote in message
... In message , Tom Anderson writes http://urchin.earth.li/~twic/Duffield_Sluice.jpg Almost certainly it was originally a sluice gate for one of the many tidal mills in Bermondsey. Ditches would channel the incoming Thames tide into mill ponds and the sluice gate would be shut to trap the water. During working hours, providing there was an outgoing tide, the gate would be opened to allow the water back into the river, powering various mills as it went. I thought tidal mills operated both as the tide went in and when it went out. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] The Duffield Sluice
In message , John Rowland
writes I thought tidal mills operated both as the tide went in and when it went out. I think a few were reversible (the one built into London Bridge for lifting water, for example) but most of those operating machinery worked only on the outflow - I suspect because rather complicated mechanics might well be necessary to make everything reversible (and by the time engineering had reached that stage, steam was replacing water power). There's a rather fun animation of the typical system (requiring Flash) at: http://home.freeuk.com/david.charter...ls/mymodel.htm -- Paul Terry |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
[OT] The Duffield Sluice
JRS: In article , dated Wed, 23 Nov 2005
10:33:08, seen in news:uk.transport.london, Paul Terry posted : In message , John Rowland writes I thought tidal mills operated both as the tide went in and when it went out. I think a few were reversible (the one built into London Bridge for lifting water, for example) but most of those operating machinery worked only on the outflow - I suspect because rather complicated mechanics might well be necessary to make everything reversible (and by the time engineering had reached that stage, steam was replacing water power). Not complicated, by not reversing the machinery. Tidal River ---------------- --------------- | ----------------- | *==== Machinery ====* | ----------------- | ---------------- --------------- Pond Each *==== is a lock gate, hinged at *; they're drawn in the neutral position, but while working one is (on the diagram) up and the other is down (they're always parallel). If the left one is swung as the water will push it, and the right one is swung the other way, water will always flow left-to-right through Machinery. Either you pay a man to move the gates at slack water; or you make the * into pinions, engaging with worms driven by fan-wheels driven by flow through a small pipe from river to pond - something like the fan-wheel of a windmill which puts the main wheel facing the wind. The man would be cheaper. I have no idea whether anyone did it or thought of it; it's essentially a hydraulic full-wave rectifier using switches for diodes. -- © John Stockton, Surrey, UK. / © Web URL:http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/ - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links. Correct = 4-line sig. separator as above, a line precisely "-- " (SoRFC1036) Do not Mail News to me. Before a reply, quote with "" or " " (SoRFC1036) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|