Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Just a quick reminder that Shoreditch station (East London Line) will close permanently this Friday. Last train appears to depart at 20:34 IIRC, this will be the first station closure on the Underground since Aldwych, North Weald and Ongar closed (on the same day) in 1994. However, there has been a subsequent line closure - Green Park to Charing Cross when the Jubilee Line Extension opened. The closure also brings to an end the most unusual service pattern on the Underground: M-F peaks and Sunday until mid-afternoon only. Chris |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chris Read" wrote in message ... Just a quick reminder that Shoreditch station (East London Line) will close permanently this Friday. Last train appears to depart at 20:34 Thankyou for the reminder. I must try hard to get there early Friday morning and 'do' the ELL in full for the first, and in this way, last time. I have a personal interest in this station as it is located on Pedley Street.... Nick Pedley |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am also very grateful for the reminder. I will pay my provisional last
respects to-morrow, as I may not be able to make Friday night. If I possibly can, I'll be there at the death. Adrian |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kev wrote:
Considering that the ELL will go from nowhere to nowhere it seems alot of money to spend. Hey - i live in nowhere (Dalston), We've been waiting for this line for far too long. E. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Chris Read" wrote in
: Just a quick reminder that Shoreditch station (East London Line) will close permanently this Friday. Last train appears to depart at 20:34 IIRC, this will be the first station closure on the Underground since Aldwych, North Weald and Ongar closed (on the same day) in 1994. However, there has been a subsequent line closure - Green Park to Charing Cross when the Jubilee Line Extension opened. The closure also brings to an end the most unusual service pattern on the Underground: M-F peaks and Sunday until mid-afternoon only. Thanks for the reminder. And a rap on the knuckles of the people who designed the latest map.... it says that the station would close on Saturday 10 June whereas technically it's late on Friday 9 June. As a Brick Lane fan, this station will be sorely missed. I was there just last night, when I went to the Vibe Bar on Brick Lane to have a few jars - that turned out to be quite a lot of jars in the end. I hope they've made the right decision. Personally, I'm not convinced. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tristán White wrote:
I hope they've made the right decision. Personally, I'm not convinced. Why do you think that? |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Morton wrote in news:4en72hF1foaaoU1
@individual.net: Tristán White wrote: I hope they've made the right decision. Personally, I'm not convinced. Why do you think that? Brick Lane is fast becoming one of London's major thoroughfares for late night bars and clubs, not to mention the restaurants. But it's not the safest of areas late at night (in case you're wondering, a good mate of mine was beaten up there by a gang in an unprovoked attack not long ago). It never has been the safest of areas right from Jack the Ripper days! :-)) Having an underground station nearby means that it's easy to get in and out without having to make your way through backstreets to the new alternative station on Shoreditch High Street. Which is not ready yet as an alternative (if it goes to schedule, we're looking at June 2010 - four years to go!) Therefore, I think they should have extended the current hours of the station, rather than dispense of a very quaint station. Another thing: Has anyone studied the impact that 4 year period will have on Brick Lane market? But my main reason is much more 'romantic'. It's always sad to see the death of a station, especially one which has survived two world wars in one of the country's most heavily blitzed areas. And a Grade II listed one at that (I am sure palms will be greased and it will be turned into yet another bunch of offices or something). Do we really want to lose even more history? Could they not have gone up to Hoxton from the current station? (surely Brick Lane needed it more than Shoreditch High Street, which is served excellently nearby by Liverpool Street station (which has trains going to Hackney area already). Come on! The old Bishopsgate station was made redundant in the 19th century when Liverpool Street expanded! I remember seeing PDFs and consultations and stuff on UTL when they were discussing the exact route north of Whitechapel, but I can't remember reading a completely convincing argument why they couldn't use the existing route that used to go to Liverpool Street pre-war (and which was a goods-only service until the 60s). If they could have provided an interchange from the ELL-Extension at Bishopsgate/SHS to the Central Line, I would agree that there is sense in moving the station to Bishopsgate. But since there's not (another missed opportunity), what is the exact thinking? Or they could even have integrated Bishopsgate with Liverpool Street via an escalator link or something - done a Monument/Bank thing. But no. So was it really necessary to get rid of another piece of functional history? A quaint little station, with original wooden floors in the booking hall, and with the bizarrest opening hours on the whole network. A great shame. I'm not an expert, just a 'passenger' (I prefer calling myself a passenger than a customer, sorry). So my thoughts are largely governed by personal feelings and sorrow at areas losing a bit of history. I should add that. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 18:38:25 -0500, Tristán White wrote:
Therefore, I think they should have extended the current hours of the station, rather than dispense of a very quaint station. Another thing: Has anyone studied the impact that 4 year period will have on Brick Lane market? But my main reason is much more 'romantic'. It's always sad to see the death of a station, especially one which has survived two world wars in one of the country's most heavily blitzed areas. And a Grade II listed one at that (I am sure palms will be greased and it will be turned into yet another bunch of offices or something). It will no doubt disappoint you to hear the following. I don't know about the station itself, but according to TfL's ELLX video[1], the Shoreditch "branch" from the extended ELL, which lies in cutting, will be filled in. (Presumably this is so they can build offices or something on it.) This will all but preclude any future use of the station, or the connection to the GEML. [1] http://ellp.tfl.gov.uk/UserFiles/Fil...don%20Line.zip |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
asdf wrote:
It will no doubt disappoint you to hear the following. I don't know about the station itself, but according to TfL's ELLX video[1], the Shoreditch "branch" from the extended ELL, which lies in cutting, will be filled in. (Presumably this is so they can build offices or something on it.) This will all but preclude any future use of the station, or the connection to the GEML. Not half as much as it would have disappointed to hear that they were planning to put a thin-walled concrete tunnel over the line and infill with earth so that they could build above it... -- http://gallery120232.fotopic.net/p9632805.html (31 187 at London Liverpool Street, 13 Apr 1980) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
RIP Wagn | London Transport | |||
Silverlink south of Stratford soon RIP? | London Transport | |||
RIP 19 RMs | London Transport | |||
Shoreditch Station | London Transport | |||
Shoreditch tube | London Transport |