![]() |
Overheating on the Tube
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/engla...on/5058362.stm
LU's managing director Tim O'Toole said: "There is no one overall solution to heat on the Tube but significant progress is now being made. I thought that Tim O'Toole's solution was for everybody to take a shower in the morning. Kevin |
Overheating on the Tube
Kev wrote: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/engla...on/5058362.stm LU's managing director Tim O'Toole said: "There is no one overall solution to heat on the Tube but significant progress is now being made. I thought that Tim O'Toole's solution was for everybody to take a shower in the morning. Kevin I've been on underground lines in other countries that get as hot or hotter than London does in the summer and have never noticed any undue heat. I think a lot of it has to do with the original constuctions methods. Some places such as Budapest and Paris are cut and cover, with the stations not far below the surface. But both these were constructed not long after London and I've never found them to be as hot as parts of the District/Circle in high summer. The Paris stations are quite large, but many of the Budapest one are rather small. If you need to look at the difference, take a trip to Athens. Some of the newer stations there are large and airy, airconditioned and with wide platforms. The trains are larger than London tube trains as well, and you never feel hot, despite the higher temperatures outside. Obviously you cannot rebuild the entire LU, but if we are to get hotter summers some though must be given to the comfort of passengers. The stations on the Jubille Line extension are a good starting point.People tend to remember an uncomfortable journey on a hot day for longer than they do one on a cold day when the heat below ground is more welcoming. Neill |
Overheating on the Tube
Neillw001 wrote: I've never found them to be as hot as parts of the District/Circle in high summer. The problem on the circle line seems to be all the heat coming from under the seats |
Overheating on the Tube
C! wrote: Neillw001 wrote: I've never found them to be as hot as parts of the District/Circle in high summer. The problem on the circle line seems to be all the heat coming from under the seats Yes, and the fact that none of the windows open. This is crazy! The only stock with opening windows is the A60 and D78 - the more modern stock does not (except a small bit of the end-doors). It seems pure madness to have double-glazing throughout, for example, on the C69/77 stock (Circle Line etc.) which is PURELY to house the doors when they are open! More modern stock, e.g. 1992 stock on Northern Line at least has the doors opening oustide the body, so no double-glazing needed, but why did they not devise opening windows for that stock? I have today found out that on 1973 stock (Piccadilly Line), if one sits on the VERY end seat, i.e. nearest the driver's bulkhead, a faint stream of airconditioning breeze can be felt if one sits with one's head right against the glass! I'll be corrected if I'm wrong, but I think that this is the ONLY ventillated seat in driving carriages. Marc. |
Overheating on the Tube
Neillw001 wrote:
I've been on underground lines in other countries that get as hot or hotter than London does in the summer and have never noticed any undue heat. I think a lot of it has to do with the original constuctions methods. Some places such as Budapest and Paris are cut and cover, with the stations not far below the surface. But both these were constructed not long after London and I've never found them to be as hot as parts of the District/Circle in high summer. The Paris stations are quite large, but many of the Budapest one are rather small. Merseyrail is always pleasantly cool in summer, and I believe this is in part down to groundwater - so the story on the BBC website about cooling that may be helpful. Neil |
Overheating on the Tube
Greetings.
In article .com, Neillw001 wrote: I've been on underground lines in other countries that get as hot or hotter than London does in the summer and have never noticed any undue heat. I think a lot of it has to do with the original constuctions methods. Some places such as Budapest and Paris are cut and cover, with the stations not far below the surface. But both these were constructed not long after London and I've never found them to be as hot as parts of the District/Circle in high summer. Only one of the Budapest lines (the oldest) is cut-and-cover. The other two are (very) deep tunnels. However, you're correct that none of the three lines get particularly hot in the summer. Regards, Tristan -- _ _V.-o Tristan Miller [en,(fr,de,ia)] Space is limited / |`-' -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= In a haiku, so it's hard (7_\\ http://www.nothingisreal.com/ To finish what you |
Overheating on the Tube
Riding on the Berlin u-bahn and s-bahn last month in temperatures
comparable to today revealed little passenger discomfort since the cars all have proper opening hinged side windows. So far wide do they open that pictorgrams forbid the throwing out of bottles and cans, which is probably why nanny state Britain would forbid us from having them here. The D Stock were saunas when first introduced in comparison with the R and CO/CP stock they replaced and until opening windows were retro-fitted. Doubtless the awful S-stock planned to replace them will be likewise until air-con is fitted. |
Overheating on the Tube
On 8 Jun 2006 03:58:42 -0700, "Kev" wrote:
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/engla...on/5058362.stm LU's managing director Tim O'Toole said: "There is no one overall solution to heat on the Tube but significant progress is now being made. I thought that Tim O'Toole's solution was for everybody to take a shower in the morning. I think that was a quote taken somewhat out of context. Interestingly (!) I got caught in a 15 delay between St James Park and Victoria this evening. This was due a passenger ill on a train at Sloane Square. The driver gave us what advice / information he could and we knew that a doctor was on the scene at Sloane Square. In the carriage I was in a young chap said he was hot, then that he couldn't breath and then was starting to panic somewhat. This then made his breathing problem (appear) even worse. The passengers nearest him did what they could to cool him down with water and by fanning him. A qualified first aider then came along and sat him down and got him to breath in a controlled manner. He got off at Victoria with the first aider and some assistance was sought from the platform staff. I haven't witnessed that sort of situation before (with heat) and I was a little surprised to see how the panic built up in just one person so quickly. It also led me to consider what would have happened if the train had been very full (it wasn't thankfully) and been stuck for much longer. I will be giving some feedback on my experience to the Line Manager as I think some more frequent announcements from the driver and a better view of timescales (hard I know in such cases) might have calmed matters down. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Overheating on the Tube
John B wrote: wrote: Riding on the Berlin u-bahn and s-bahn last month in temperatures comparable to today revealed little passenger discomfort since the cars all have proper opening hinged side windows. So far wide do they open that pictorgrams forbid the throwing out of bottles and cans, which is probably why nanny state Britain would forbid us from having them here. The D Stock were saunas when first introduced in comparison with the R and CO/CP stock they replaced and until opening windows were retro-fitted. Doubtless the awful S-stock planned to replace them will be likewise until air-con is fitted. Aircon will be factory-fitted in S-stock. Not quite sure why it's otherwise 'dreadful' - the stock it's replacing isn't steam-powered or loco-hauled[*] and doesn't have slam doors, so the usual objections don't apply. Articulated doorways add significantly to the ambience of metro stock, and they seem to be planning a sensible door configuration. [*] hmm, tautologous? Anyone know of an SMU? -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org Does "articulated doorways" mean that each carriage will be directly connected to its neighbours, thus removing the ONLY source of decent ventilation, i.e. the end-doors' opening windows?! So, the ONLY place on the train where one can actually stand and feel reasonably comfortable in hot weather is going to be removed. What's that "ambience" to which you are referring: tropics under London? Now, that's REAL progress! Marc. |
Overheating on the Tube
I think the problem with the District and Circle lines is they pass
Westminster. An awful lot of hot air eminates from there. "C!" wrote in message oups.com... Neillw001 wrote: I've never found them to be as hot as parts of the District/Circle in high summer. The problem on the circle line seems to be all the heat coming from under the seats |
Overheating on the Tube
wrote:
John B wrote: wrote: Riding on the Berlin u-bahn and s-bahn last month in temperatures comparable to today revealed little passenger discomfort since the cars all have proper opening hinged side windows. So far wide do they open that pictorgrams forbid the throwing out of bottles and cans, which is probably why nanny state Britain would forbid us from having them here. The D Stock were saunas when first introduced in comparison with the R and CO/CP stock they replaced and until opening windows were retro-fitted. Doubtless the awful S-stock planned to replace them will be likewise until air-con is fitted. Aircon will be factory-fitted in S-stock. Not quite sure why it's otherwise 'dreadful' - the stock it's replacing isn't steam-powered or loco-hauled[*] and doesn't have slam doors, so the usual objections don't apply. Articulated doorways add significantly to the ambience of metro stock, and they seem to be planning a sensible door configuration. [*] hmm, tautologous? Anyone know of an SMU? -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org Does "articulated doorways" mean that each carriage will be directly connected to its neighbours, thus removing the ONLY source of decent ventilation, i.e. the end-doors' opening windows?! So, the ONLY place on the train where one can actually stand and feel reasonably comfortable in hot weather is going to be removed. What's that "ambience" to which you are referring: tropics under London? Now, that's REAL progress! Marc. But it will be fitted with AirCon from new. |
Overheating on the Tube
wrote:
Aircon will be factory-fitted in S-stock. Not quite sure why it's otherwise 'dreadful' - the stock it's replacing isn't steam-powered or loco-hauled[*] and doesn't have slam doors, so the usual objections don't apply. Articulated doorways add significantly to the ambience of metro stock, and they seem to be planning a sensible door configuration. Does "articulated doorways" mean that each carriage will be directly connected to its neighbours, thus removing the ONLY source of decent ventilation, i.e. the end-doors' opening windows?! So, the ONLY place on the train where one can actually stand and feel reasonably comfortable in hot weather is going to be removed. What's that "ambience" to which you are referring: tropics under London? Now, that's REAL progress! See the first sentence, "aircon will be factory fitted in S-stock". -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Overheating on the Tube
Paul Corfield wrote: On 8 Jun 2006 03:58:42 -0700, "Kev" wrote: http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/engla...on/5058362.stm LU's managing director Tim O'Toole said: "There is no one overall solution to heat on the Tube but significant progress is now being made. I thought that Tim O'Toole's solution was for everybody to take a shower in the morning. I think that was a quote taken somewhat out of context. Interestingly (!) I got caught in a 15 delay between St James Park and Victoria this evening. This was due a passenger ill on a train at Sloane Square. The driver gave us what advice / information he could and we knew that a doctor was on the scene at Sloane Square. In the carriage I was in a young chap said he was hot, then that he couldn't breath and then was starting to panic somewhat. This then made his breathing problem (appear) even worse. The passengers nearest him did what they could to cool him down with water and by fanning him. A qualified first aider then came along and sat him down and got him to breath in a controlled manner. He got off at Victoria with the first aider and some assistance was sought from the platform staff. I haven't witnessed that sort of situation before (with heat) and I was a little surprised to see how the panic built up in just one person so quickly. It also led me to consider what would have happened if the train had been very full (it wasn't thankfully) and been stuck for much longer. I will be giving some feedback on my experience to the Line Manager as I think some more frequent announcements from the driver and a better view of timescales (hard I know in such cases) might have calmed matters down. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! Panic attacks are the thing that make me wary of travelling on the Underground. The problem with them is that they can strike anyone at any time and can set off an attack in other people. If you don't know how to deal with them they can be very distressing. If you do know how to deal with them, sometimes your mind takes over and you can't apply comntrol methods. Having a guard with medical traiing on trains might alleviate the problem and provide communication with the driver, but obviously that's not going to happen. Some sort of control over the number of people allowed to cram into a carriage in hot weather might be a better solution, perhaps even going as far a banning standing at those times. Neill |
Overheating on the Tube
Neillw001 wrote:
Some sort of control over the number of people allowed to cram into a carriage in hot weather might be a better solution, perhaps even going as far a banning standing at those times. ....which would instead cause similar crowds in stations or just outside. It wouldn't work, which is probably why it hasn't been done. Neil |
Overheating on the Tube
John B wrote: See the first sentence, "aircon will be factory fitted in S-stock". -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org Your point being? Marc. |
Overheating on the Tube
wrote:
See the first sentence, "aircon will be factory fitted in S-stock". Your point being? That it will no longer be the case that standing by an open inter-car window will be the only way you can keep cool. Instead, there will be a load of vents and grilles blowing cold air into the car in summer and warm air in winter. This will mean that the ambience is pleasant, rather than either tropical or frozen. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Overheating on the Tube
Kev wrote:
http://newsvote.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/engla...on/5058362.stm LU's managing director Tim O'Toole said: "There is no one overall solution to heat on the Tube but significant progress is now being made. I thought that Tim O'Toole's solution was for everybody to take a shower in the morning. Kevin What amazes is that, even in this weather, some of the City types are still wearing their hot suit jackets. Perhaps TfL should start working with local businesses to discourage this. Looking smart is all very well, but not much good if you're covered in sweat. Thank goodness my office has a relaxed dress code. |
Overheating on the Tube
John B wrote:
wrote: See the first sentence, "aircon will be factory fitted in S-stock". Your point being? That it will no longer be the case that standing by an open inter-car window will be the only way you can keep cool. Instead, there will be a load of vents and grilles blowing cold air into the car in summer and warm air in winter. This will mean that the ambience is pleasant, rather than either tropical or frozen. For the first 3 weeks, until the ac breaks down, which will happen. |
Overheating on the Tube
Spyke wrote:
What amazes is that, even in this weather, some of the City types are still wearing their hot suit jackets. Perhaps TfL should start working with local businesses to discourage this. Looking smart is all very well, but not much good if you're covered in sweat. Thank goodness my office has a relaxed dress code. Came in to work this morning with the usual tshirt/jacket combo -- it can get very cold at 3AM (especially when you're getting about 5 hours of broken sleep a day with 7 12 hour nights in a row), which is stifflingly hot for the walk back from the station tomorow lunch time, but there's not much choice from a practical point of view, no room in my bag. |
Overheating on the Tube
wrote in message ups.com... C! wrote: Neillw001 wrote: I've never found them to be as hot as parts of the District/Circle in high summer. The problem on the circle line seems to be all the heat coming from under the seats Yes, and the fact that none of the windows open. This is crazy! The only stock with opening windows is the A60 and D78 - the more modern stock does not (except a small bit of the end-doors). It seems pure madness to have double-glazing throughout, for example, on the C69/77 stock (Circle Line etc.) which is PURELY to house the doors when they are open! More modern stock, e.g. 1992 stock on Northern Line at least has the doors opening oustide the body, so no double-glazing needed, but why did they not devise opening windows for that stock? I have today found out that on 1973 stock (Piccadilly Line), if one sits on the VERY end seat, i.e. nearest the driver's bulkhead, a faint stream of airconditioning breeze can be felt if one sits with one's head right against the glass! I'll be corrected if I'm wrong, but I think that this is the ONLY ventillated seat in driving carriages. Marc. When has 92TS ran on the Northern Line? Andrew |
Overheating on the Tube
There was an item on the news last night about overheating on the tube - but
in the stations, not on the trains. Engineers at Victoria (and later on at other stations which get very hot) will use the water that is pumped out of the ground (which would otherwise flood the station) to cool the ambient air in a heat exchanger. They quoted reductions of temperatures of about 5 deg C - to 25 deg C. But none of this addresses the problem of the trains themselves getting unbearably hot, which mainly happens because so few windows on modern stock can open so you don't get a draught through the train. |
Overheating on the Tube
Neil Williams wrote:
...which would instead cause similar crowds in stations or just outside. It wouldn't work, which is probably why it hasn't been done. Why can't we air condition the stations at least? These can be just as unbearable, and it can't be TOO difficult to do. Expensive, yes, but a decent system could clean and filter the air too. I know the deep level stations have the problem of heat extraction, but if you can sort out the stations then it must help overall passenger comfort. Else have part of a train that collects the extracted heat, which is then vented at a station? Jonathan |
Overheating on the Tube
"awful S-stock" ? Say 32% less seating for those unfortunates on the Met Line. |
Overheating on the Tube
Jonathan Morris wrote: Neil Williams wrote: ...which would instead cause similar crowds in stations or just outside. It wouldn't work, which is probably why it hasn't been done. Why can't we air condition the stations at least? These can be just as unbearable, and it can't be TOO difficult to do. Expensive, yes, but a decent system could clean and filter the air too. I know the deep level stations have the problem of heat extraction, but if you can sort out the stations then it must help overall passenger comfort. Else have part of a train that collects the extracted heat, which is then vented at a station? Jonathan "Might" be feasible on a small station, but a place like Oxford Circus has a total of 4 2/3 miles* of passageway (inc non public). Now look at the air con plants at your place of work and consider where you'd put one big enough to make a difference round OXO C , or any other decent sized central London station. And as for Bank ... The trains have a similar problem - any aircon plant big enough to deal with 100 people per carriage is going to be too big to fit under the floor or seats (scale up a four person car plant ...). And you have to carry the heat out of the tunnel, not dump it in so you would need one hell of a heat sink - with the same space constraint problem, as well as a reliable system of dumping the heat when in the open and not in the tunnel - and thats without the problem of the Victoria Line where the trains only surface when in the depot... The other issue is cost / benefit. After all do you really want to pay for all this expensive engineering when the number of days the tube is really unbearable is in finger counting territory in a typical year ? |
Overheating on the Tube
Yes, and the fact that none of the windows open. This is crazy! The
only stock with opening windows is the A60 and D78 - the more modern stock does not (except a small bit of the end-doors). Admit defeat on this one - don't know why. Suspect the nanny state over the years. Haven't looked, but do the refurbished D78s have opening windows ? And I can't remember whether the Pic '72s had them before their refurbishment. If so we can approximately date the likely change in standards. It seems pure madness to have double-glazing throughout, for example, on the C69/77 stock (Circle Line etc.) which is PURELY to house the doors when they are open! More modern stock, e.g. 1992 stock on Northern Line at least has the doors opening oustide the body, so no double-glazing needed, but why did they not devise opening windows for that stock? They are not double glazed, there are two panes of glass :O) Not as daft as it sounds, there is no seal and quite some airflow, and the temperature of the air in the cavity is effectively the same as the outside. The trend to outside hung doors has more to do with the gaining of a couple of inches of space ... |
Overheating on the Tube
On 11 Jun 2006 00:44:42 -0700, "Mark W"
wrote: The other issue is cost / benefit. After all do you really want to pay for all this expensive engineering when the number of days the tube is really unbearable is in finger counting territory in a typical year ? Do you travel in the rush hour? -- James Farrar . @gmail.com |
Overheating on the Tube
Neil Williams wrote:
Merseyrail is always pleasantly cool in summer, and I believe this is in part down to groundwater - so the story on the BBC website about cooling that may be helpful. Perhaps they shoudHighbury an Islington are very cool, especially compared with the neighbouring Victoria Line ones that are very hot |
Overheating on the Tube
In article . com, Mark
W writes Jonathan Morris wrote: Neil Williams wrote: ...which would instead cause similar crowds in stations or just outside. It wouldn't work, which is probably why it hasn't been done. Why can't we air condition the stations at least? These can be just as unbearable, and it can't be TOO difficult to do. Expensive, yes, but a decent system could clean and filter the air too. I know the deep level stations have the problem of heat extraction, but if you can sort out the stations then it must help overall passenger comfort. Else have part of a train that collects the extracted heat, which is then vented at a station? Jonathan "Might" be feasible on a small station, but a place like Oxford Circus has a total of 4 2/3 miles* of passageway (inc non public). Now look at the air con plants at your place of work and consider where you'd put one big enough to make a difference round OXO C , or any other decent sized central London station. And as for Bank ... snip But if we can cool the stations even a bit then when the trains stop some of the internal heat can be exhausted. I agree that air-con on the trains is virtually a non-starter - there is nowhere for the heat to go and not enough space for the heat exchanger. However, if we cool the stations then there is a chance that the tunnels and trains will also be a bit cooler. Obviously any ground water already pumped away should be used as a heat sink, but surely we could also use water to transfer heat from the platforms to the surface (heat exchanger both ends? -- John Alexander, Remove NOSPAM if replying by e-mail |
Overheating on the Tube
On 8 Jun 2006 14:38:45 -0700, "John B" wrote:
[*] hmm, tautologous? Anyone know of an SMU? http://www.brc-stockbook.co.uk/smu.htm ? There have been railcars and multiple-vehicle units powered by steam, but I don't know about ones which could work in multiple (rather than just be coupled together or to a trailer) -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
Overheating on the Tube
I have today found out that on 1973 stock (Piccadilly Line), if one sits on the VERY end seat, i.e. nearest the driver's bulkhead, a faint stream of airconditioning breeze can be felt if one sits with one's head right against the glass! I'll be corrected if I'm wrong, but I think that this is the ONLY ventillated seat in driving carriages. Most likely due to the fact that the driver's cab is air conditioned (when it deigns to work!) |
Overheating on the Tube
John B wrote: wrote: See the first sentence, "aircon will be factory fitted in S-stock". Your point being? That it will no longer be the case that standing by an open inter-car window will be the only way you can keep cool. Instead, there will be a load of vents and grilles blowing cold air into the car in summer and warm air in winter. This will mean that the ambience is pleasant, rather than either tropical or frozen. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org Sorry, John, I've been away a while, and hence lost this thread's continuation. As, a subsequent poster has written: the problem with air conditioning is that it very oten "gets it wrong" and you can feel far too cold in Summer and vice versa in Winter. This is something I have frequently experienced on Southern's new 377 / 375 stock on the Brighton line. Give me proper passenger-regulated ventilation any day! A cool breeze in Summer and a normal heater in Winter. These can be had for a fraction of the cost and complication of air conditioning. Marc. |
Overheating on the Tube
John B wrote: Couldn't agree more re poorly designed office AC systems. However, have you travelled on the NYC subway / Madrid metro? In both cases, the AC seems to work well at keeping the cars cool without creating much of a draught. Hopefully Bombardier will take note of whatever systems are used there when designing the S-stock. That would be good. Experience with inter-city aircon doesn't fill me with a lot of confidence 8-). Francis |
Overheating on the Tube
wrote:
Sorry, John, I've been away a while, and hence lost this thread's continuation. As, a subsequent poster has written: the problem with air conditioning is that it very oten "gets it wrong" and you can feel far too cold in Summer and vice versa in Winter. This is something I have frequently experienced on Southern's new 377 / 375 stock on the Brighton line. Give me proper passenger-regulated ventilation any day! A cool breeze in Summer and a normal heater in Winter. These can be had for a fraction of the cost and complication of air conditioning. WRT surface stock, I'm agnostic: there are obvious benefits to passenger-regulated ventilation, but also obvious negatives. I find that SWT's Desiros have better temperature control than either the 455s or the mk1 stock; I've only ever had temperature problems on mk3 stock when the AC was broken (the last year of VWC operation, pretty much exclusively); and problems on 158s and 166s have generally only occured when some twit has opened the windows. I don't have much Electrostar experience, though. Underground is a different story - it's clear from making any journey in the rush hour in summer, whether that's A, C or D stock, that passenger-regulated ventilation isn't adequate. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Overheating on the Tube
wrote in message Just what I was going to say. I am required to wear suit etc while appearing in court. That can be a pretty heavy load in hot weather, but there's really no option. While "In Court", yes, but I assume they have proper ventilation in courthouses. We are talking about one's journey to/from work/court. Richard [in SG19] -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Overheating on the Tube
Richard M Willis wrote: wrote in message Just what I was going to say. I am required to wear suit etc while appearing in court. That can be a pretty heavy load in hot weather, but there's really no option. While "In Court", yes, but I assume they have proper ventilation in courthouses. We are talking about one's journey to/from work/court. Richard [in SG19] -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com I hear what you say, Richard, but there are three issues. Firstly, I don't think that one's client would like to see one dressed in a casual way and enter the Court building and then change (a la David Cameron!). Secondly, if appearing in the higher Courts we are already carrying a set of robes, wig etc., not to mention books, files etc., so a change of clothing would be virtually impossible to carry as well. Thirdly, the lower Courts have no changing facilities, and most of the higher Courts have unisex robing rooms, so one is unlikely to be able to change one's clothes in privacy. Marc. |
Overheating on the Tube
On 21 Jun 2006 05:42:52 -0700, "
wrote: Give me proper passenger-regulated ventilation any day! A cool breeze in Summer and a normal heater in Winter. These can be had for a fraction of the cost and complication of air conditioning. Hmm. I've taken to waiting a few minutes later to catch the Heathrow Connect (Ealing Broadway - Paddington) rather than the FGW train because it's so much more pleasant. Nice at 2230/2238, essential at 1214/1223. -- James Farrar . @gmail.com |
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk